"According to the PEJ study, 32 percent of Fox News Channel's coverage* between Feb. 8 and March 2 was devoted to the Anna Nicole Smith story (for MSNBC, the figure was 21 percent; for CNN, 14 percent). "
http://www.slate.com/id/2163504/?GT1=9330
2007-04-06 17:11:27 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
O'Reilly says that he doesn't want to talk about the A.N.S. case, but every night a segment of his show is devoted to it.
2007-04-06 17:43:01 · answer #1 · answered by TRAF 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm guessing the other 68, 79, and 86 were devoted to the Donald Trump vs. Rosie O'Donald feud?
yes it is sad :(
what about real problems like immigration, stem cell research, GLOBAL WARMING, and oh yeah the little ol' heather pickin' war?
2007-04-07 00:21:32 · answer #2 · answered by xenon 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Must've been a pretty slow news week for Fox...-I wonder if they would've cut into their coverage had there been another 9/11 type attack... :)
2007-04-07 01:30:49 · answer #3 · answered by Joseph, II 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, that's sad.
It's also why you should be watching a REAL news channel - not Faux News.
2007-04-07 00:22:27 · answer #4 · answered by RTWS 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's sick, a waste of time there more important things in the world to cover,that's new.
2007-04-07 14:24:13 · answer #5 · answered by steve f 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What's sad is if people weren't watching they wouldn't be running it.
2007-04-07 00:38:12 · answer #6 · answered by school1859 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
school18-people wouldn't be watching it if there was anything eles on
2007-04-07 00:53:41 · answer #7 · answered by SydneyS 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
and the problem is ?
2007-04-07 00:15:29 · answer #8 · answered by moonsister_98 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋