9/11 Conspiracy Theorists? You say you can debunk everything that debunks your theories?

Question

Of course you can. No matter what credible investigations showed there was no conspiracy, you will still always counter with your own "credible" websites. I actually have a couple of questions for you:

1. I would really like a list of the 897 trillion websites that show 9/11 was an inside job (as one CT posted). Can you give it to me?

2. How is it your "credible" sources are any better than the sources that debunk them?

3. Why is it necessary to have multiple Loose Change videos? Is it because they are being debunked?

4. Can you show proof that Popular Mechanics is biased?

5. How is it that after so long, this is still supressed? No anonymous confessions, no proof, no documents?

Anyway, I just want to know how you can be so certain you are right? And, please, keep your namecalling to yourself.

Answer 1

I think you're on the right track, but the conspiracy theorists are on a different train.

It's really pretty simple - just ask yourself why, despite some of their impressive credentials, not one single piece of evidence "discovered or uncovered" has ever been printed in a reputable or scientific venue that can reviewed by their peers? Why only on $$$$ ob-blog web sites and fictional "documentaries?" (The $$$$ is a hint.)

Added note: And your note about Loosechange was dead on - examples include the first release had Fight 93 shot down by military aircraft - later release "revised" to have it landing in Cleveland Hopkins Airport and actually seen back in service at a later date.
And a little out of context "proof" in the same film had coroner Wally Miller as finding no bodies at the crash scene of flight 93 - and leaves it at that - fact is, in the next several weeks, Miller identified more than a dozen passengers using mostly dental records.
Loosechange is a slick production which uses unreliable sources, over simplified arguments, cherry picked facts, out of context quotes and, for what its worth, pushes the agenda of its production company, "Louder Than Words," which, incidentally, is a member of the "9/11 Truth Movement."

Answer 2

forget about all the stuff mentioned in the videos and use logic.
That should be the definitive. You can say whatever you want to say, but that does not prove that this government is not covering up .

1. first of all. you want a list of websites, just google 911, pentagon, flight 93 and building 7.

2. on that day, three buildings fell onto their footprints at free fall speed. that is not a logical thing.

someone mentioned that steel did not melt. I saw the original news footage and saw molten metal. this is not a logical thing.

3. flight 93. no wreckage, just a hole in the ground. this is not logical.

4. the pentagon. the new official story (there has been several to try and explain this event. a 757 was highjacked by one man whom could barely fly a cesna and flew this enormous airplane over protected airspace, and while traveling 2 feet above ground, managed to hit 7 light posts and continue its path onto the side of the pentagon which just happened to be under renovation. not a logical thing.

5. cell phone calls from flight 93.. reports of people calling from their cellphones while traveling at an altitude of 25,000 feet. A canadian scientist performed a test. He took different cellphones in a cesna and had a pilot fly an airplane, all the while testing all cellphones to see if there could be reception. after 8,000, no cellphone worked.

You start to get my drift here. If there is any conspiracy going on, it is the government who's performing it. People get annoyed at others who question the official report. They called it unpatriotic. This is not so! Everyone should question this event, because nothing has been explained by this bush administration. ignorance is what keeps people in THERE PLACE.

common sense rules. The 911 commission had none of it. How else can a commission omit the reasoning behind building 7. People, you need to open your eyes.

Answer 3

Just a comment: The conspiracy theorist claim the government claims that the steel was"melted " from the jet fuel. This is NOT the case. The government said the steel was simply weakened by the high temps that jet fuel burns. After all steel was melted at one time and poured into molds. It is obvious the high temp. that jet fuel burns would, according to physics, weaken yet not melt steel when put under such weight and temp.

They need to get their feeling of superiority by believing they know more than Isacc Newton with some other hair brained scheme because this one is a lost cause for them. The only positive that come from this for them is more division among Americans by spreading their lies.

They hate capitalism and it's destruction is their real goal. The far left professors know this and have a political agenda rather than a law enforcement one.

The same goes for Al Gore.

Thank you

Answer 4

And I'd like to add another question.

If the 9/11 Fantasies are true...if this was all orchestrated by the U.S. Government and kept quiet all these many years...why would they permit people to create websites exposing the conspiracy...why would they permit people like the Yahoo Theorists to continually expose them on the internet. After all, if they have already killed almost 3,000, why would they hesitate to silence a few more?

I asked a similar question once before. And I got answers like "freedom of speech" and it is a democracy. But if your theory is true...you wouldn't be permitted freedom of speech. And democracy would be a thing of the past!

As in the case of "Operation Bite", your "Conspiracy Fantasy" is a non-starter!

Answer 5

You're not going to get any real answers. These people are so wrapped up in hatred for the bush administration that the blinders go on and logic turns off. Everyone wants to think that the truth is so much more sinister than the story we got. Thats so boring. Why not spice it up with shadow government actions, jewish real estate moguls killing innocents for gold, and controlled demolition? Yeah, that'll do nicely. These are the kind of people who want to prove all their misconceptions as truth, facts be damned, so later on they can claim that they were the first to blow the lid off all the government "lies" and the rest of us are mindless sheep. There's a sick satisfaction in their little game, a feeling of importance holding their "facts" over the heads of the rest of us. It puts them on a self-made pedestal, a superiority complex, no matter how unjustified. Its pathetic. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure there are all kinds of ins and outs of 9/11 that we will never know that the governement does, but it being an inside job is so far off base I want to cry when I see my fellow countrymen blinded by hate and vitrolic bullsh*t. Of all the crap this governement does to us thats RIGHT IN OUR FACES,(income taxes, police state, constitutional violations, welfare, socail security. etc) and you have to go digging for black helicopters and G men planting explosives. Let it go, come back to reality, and lets work on the problems we know to actually be fact, not the ones you wish were.

Answer 6

The WTC have been approximately 420 meters tall, although the planes hit at approximately 330 meters up in one construction and at approximately 365 meters up in the different. loose fall at 330 meters could take approximately 8.25 sec and loose fall at 365 meters approximately 8.5 sec. as quickly as the construction began collapsing, there wasn't lots resistance. The construction's shape in common terms extra desirable the quantity of time to fall via around 15 % or so. in case you employ the authentic of the towers to calculate your loose fall time, it makes it appear like the construction's shape presented even much less resistance. i don't recognize the structural information of the construction. Supposedly, they could desire to have been waiting to stand up to the outcomes of a 707 finding for the airport in the fog. on an identical time as a 767 isn't that lots extra desirable than a 707, there's a brilliant style of difference in the cost of a 707 finding for the airport and the cost of a 767 finding to inflict as lots injury as attainable. undergo in strategies that kinetic potential is a million/2*m*v^2. the cost has a extra important result on your kinetic potential than mass. The kinetic potential from the collisions have been approximately 7 situations extra desirable than the homes have been designed to stand up to.

Answer 7

are you kidding me??

never be afraid to question the government, after all it's a democracy, right?

the reasoning behind the official story is a complete lie.. Many people are unwilling to investigate it with an open mind because they don't want to face the fact that there government, whom is supposed to be protecting it's people, chose to to use them as a pawn for their sick game of invented reasoning for a war..... It's really sad.

Answer 8

Come now, you mean you do not believe all those so called scholors at scholars for truth?

Why wouldn't you believe all thoise English phd's, Socioliogy phd's, Religion phd's, Lawyers, Biologist.

We all know they are so well versed in demolition.

After all, they saw it one time on the discover channel on cable.

I counted one time, over 90% of the so called scholors signed on to scholars for truth, had soft science or arts degrees.

Why else would anyone believe some idiot who says the WTC fell at freefall speed, when the video clearly shows falling debris falling a heck of alot faster than the building itself.

Was the debris falling at super duper freefall speed?

Invest in aluminium, i hear tin foil hats are selling like hot cakes today !!!!!!!!

Answer 9

I have another question for you. Why would our own government want to bomb the world trade center even if it was a conspiracy there were certainly less expensive and less populated buildings that would have had the same desired effect without as much effort? Does that make sense?

Answer 10

Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice
The one website I think really stands out!
They're not trying to say that a plain didn't hit the twin towers like some websites do. You have to remember that some sicotic idiot puts a totally out landish conspiricy theroy out there and then it ruins it for the whole movement even when the points level heading people are making are acurate. 9/11 was a conspiracy. Check it out here;
http://stj911.com/