English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. "

- Arthur Schopenhauer

How else can you explain their ultra-shrill attacks on Rosie O'Donnell? What are the limits of violence they will go to to protect their world-view?

2007-04-06 16:02:58 · 12 answers · asked by Scott G 1 in Politics & Government Politics

12 answers

The will illegally and dishonestly invade another country, they will say they are going after Osama and then leave him alone, they will fail to respond to Americans in need in New Orleans, they will support cheap illegal labor for American companies while pretending to want to close the border, they will bankrupt the country for profit, mortgaging it to China, they will torture other human beings without charge or trial, all so they can plunder and control. There seems to be nothing they won't do for their world view.

2007-04-06 16:17:05 · answer #1 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 1 0

Bush supporters can't argue based on ideas so they violently attack the person saying it whether verbally or physically. Luckily it is still at the verbal stage. These people are so full of rage that anything could set them off. The irony is that they've had power over this country since 1980 when Reagan started his anti-democracy campaign against the American people and they keep getting more angry. They need some sessions with Dr. Phil to find out why they hate their country so much that they keep electing people who are against American freedom and democracy.

2007-04-06 16:49:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I have no "emotional investment in him," however, I have an emotional investment in my family and I believe George Bush is doing everything he can, despite the pole numbers and constant rhetoric from the left, to protect my family.
It's about time we responded to the indiscriminate terror and murder which was committed with pretty much impunity until a president with enough guts stood up to the Islamic terrorists.
Throw in the towel if you wish - that is, after all, what France and Spain and much of the rest of the world has done - but be aware of the consequences.

2007-04-06 16:13:25 · answer #3 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 2 1

No, libs are in Stage 2.
Al Gore did not win the election. No way, no how.
You'll get through step 3. Give it time.

2007-04-06 16:16:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

rosie deserves to be attacked...can you honestly say that 9/11 was an inside job and that the iranian hostage crisis was all a hoax...i suppose you think the holocaust never happened? Terrorism was here a long time ago and many presidents let it get worse and worse...im glad bush is trying to put them down.

2007-04-06 16:07:49 · answer #5 · answered by Brian 1 2 · 4 2

LOL I AM A SUPPORTER OF BUSH I VOTED FOR HIM BUT I HAVE NO INVESTMENT IN HIM.. IM AN AVERAGE MIDDLE CLASS AMERICAN. HES DOING THE BEST HE CAN JUST LIKE ANY OTHER PRESIDENT. AND IF HE IS THE WORST WE EVER HAD WHY DID EVERYONE VOTE FOR HIM BOTH TERMS? AND NO THEY DID NOT RIG THE ELECTIONS. THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION WAS NOT ON THE BOARD THAT DELTWITH ALL THE VOTES

2007-04-06 16:09:30 · answer #6 · answered by You dont need to know my name 1 · 4 1

Rosie is a traitor. I enjoy that she is a depressive and a miserable lesbian. She is a fat slob that has no business being on the air. She is a liar and flat out distorts the facts.

2007-04-06 16:08:17 · answer #7 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 3 2

Oh right...freedom of speech is OK as long as it isn't contrary to your view. I get it now...maybe I'm becoming a Liberal!

2007-04-06 16:08:22 · answer #8 · answered by The Cult of Personality 5 · 2 0

BUSH iS A arTiculAte Nice man!

2007-04-06 16:26:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The majority are deserting him.

2007-04-06 16:09:25 · answer #10 · answered by fatsausage 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers