English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

it is clear to see he care nothing of the citzens of he U.S and is only in this war to benift him self and his family

2007-04-06 15:59:46 · 39 answers · asked by Just Because 2 in Politics & Government Government

39 answers

I understand that the "moral values" of the religious right were the decisive factor, and that disgusts me. A person who voted for Bush because of so-called "moral values" seems to be a hypocrite to me because though he may be all moral about social issues, his lying about war for profit is certainly not moral.

2007-04-06 16:18:27 · answer #1 · answered by Mackenzie G 2 · 0 1

The answer comes every voting day and it is as simple as casting your vote for the LESSER OF TWO EVILS. If the voting populace had "none of the above" choice on the ballot you would change the political landscape in this country for the better.I am sure that I am not alone in this line of thinking either.As it stands now when we go to the polls and vote for the candidates we HOLD OUR NOSE and vote.

2007-04-06 16:13:57 · answer #2 · answered by tenacious 1 2 · 0 0

The democrats keep putting up some socialist/terrorist puppet as the alternative. If they ran Lou Dobbs, I think he'd win. Especially if a candidate demanded equal media time and that Americans keep their money, instead of begging donations, and just give them their vote instead. Making it all about who raises the most money sells out the Oval Office to the highest bidder. Plus they get billions of taxpayer's dollars to boot.

2007-04-06 16:06:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

American citizen did NOT vote him in. Exit polls proves that. It was a FRAUD again. The moron who design the Dibold voting machines said he'd make sure it will assure a Bush victory. Kerry votes were rumored to be changed into Bush votes.

2007-04-06 17:03:55 · answer #4 · answered by kevdre1 2 · 0 1

Because people still vote for the "lesser of two evils" in this country, and the other choice was John Kerry.

Personally, I voted for Michael Badnarik, and still think he was a better choice than either of them.

2007-04-06 16:07:15 · answer #5 · answered by open4one 7 · 0 1

And your source is??? ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN PMSNBC??? Why you socialists insist that the president has done something other than take the best interest of the American people to heart is beyond me. Last time I looked the economy is more robust that "It has EVER been", un-employment is statistically 0%, you pay less tax now than before this administration, and you really hate that don't you! Just because it wasn't one of "your" guys. GET A GRIP, PLEASE!

2007-04-06 16:08:16 · answer #6 · answered by Boof 3 · 2 1

Only 20.6% of the citizens voted for him -- 62 million votes -- about 50.7% of the120 million people who voted. With 300 million people in the country, it is time to activate the 100 million no shows.

2007-04-06 16:02:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Because not everyone finds him "cold hearted". And how exactly is the war benefitting the Bush family? Do tell.

2007-04-06 16:08:06 · answer #8 · answered by Chicken Little 2 · 3 1

Cold Hearted. Sounds like a warm fuzzy liberal feeling. This is why LIBERALS should never be trusted with power in todays COLD HEARTED world!!!

2007-04-06 16:16:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Karl Rove

2007-04-06 16:01:56 · answer #10 · answered by BOOM 7 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers