2007-04-06 14:30:01 · 27 answers · asked by kobacker59 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Since there seems to be some confusion, the three are Senator Clinton, Senator Obama and Senator Edwards.
2007-04-06 14:44:18 · update #1
The best choices in decades. Hibernation helped. The Republicans are a wash. Throw in the towel.
2007-04-06 14:43:15 · answer #1 · answered by ToYou,Too! 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Obama, who has'nt enough of a record to be sure what he would do, other than drugs.
Hillary, who has rode the coat tails of a man who with one affair after another has robbed her of all rerspect, and she still will not leave him because she will sell herself or any of us to stay in a position of power. And who already attemted to stick us with a socialized medical system that even the Democrats wanted no part of.
Edwards, a multi-millionaire who could quit now and spend the last 5 years of his dying wife's life making it the best 5 years, but is too power hungry to think about her and his children.
I guess I do not agree.
2007-04-07 13:48:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton, Edwards and Obama would all make excellent presidents.
Actually almost anyone would be far better than what we have been cursed with for 6 years.
Another excellent choice is Dennis Kucinich. Very intelligent with great ideas.
2007-04-06 21:40:25 · answer #3 · answered by ignoramus 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes. Obama/Edwards, Clinton. In that order.
Obama raised almost as much money as Clinton, but had twice as many donors. Clinton = Corporations, Obama = individuals. IMO
Vote Obama/Edwards in 2008!
The election will not be close this time!
Wes Clark secretary of defense
Madeline Albright secretary of state.
2007-04-06 21:41:02 · answer #4 · answered by Dave 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I see 2 descent choices (neither is Hillary) but don't have a chance of being elected. I am talking about Obama and Edwards. The next President will come from the republican party! BOOK IT!!!
2007-04-06 21:39:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Much better than the Republicans. They have a liberal, a moderate, and a guy who can't decide what side of the issue he wants to be on.
Clinton, Obama, and Edwards are great, and one or two of the others wouldn't do half bad, either.
2007-04-06 21:34:45 · answer #6 · answered by amg503 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Al Gore is the best choice,dem or rep -- America was robbed in the 2000 election; I hope he will run again. It wii take decades to restore America's credibility in the world and to get us out of the financial burdens that have been created by the current administration
2007-04-06 21:55:12 · answer #7 · answered by g c 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Obama, Edwards and Richardson? If those are the 3 you are referring to, I would agree.
2007-04-06 21:37:27 · answer #8 · answered by Zelda Hunter 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I say they have 1 and a 1/2. Obama is their best and Edwards could improve himself. He just has a weasly lawyer feel about him to me
2007-04-06 21:39:23 · answer #9 · answered by bman_1977 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hillary the anti-Semite.
Obama the carefully cloaked Marxist.
Edwards.- The Lawyer who got wealthy from ripping off the medical establishment, pushed up your insurance and medical costs, and wants to be TOP lawyer.
2007-04-06 21:38:27 · answer #10 · answered by Philip H 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋