Goodness sake, I disagree with what she did as well, and consider it seditious, but she is a representative of our nation and doesn't deserve that, not until she earns it.
We still believe in "innocent until proven guilty" whether she does or not when dealing with President Bush.
Even so, Neville Chamberlain may have had a point or two. He's been so villified that people aren't interested in history as much as the myth.
2007-04-06 14:06:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by mckenziecalhoun 7
·
1⤊
5⤋
Why Neville Chamberlain? Why not Alger Hiss?
2007-04-06 14:07:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
curiously, Pelosi can. She and Hillary could have a ball interior the White living house, working ingredient by ability of ingredient, inventing lies, now does no longer they? On my disapproval score Pelosi runs 2nd to Hillary. What a pair!!!!
2016-11-07 10:19:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
is this a serous comment? nancy pelosi is a seriously twisted individual who would risk the safety and security of the united states to mask a power grab and reinstallation of failed tax and spend economic policy. after telling the electorate whatever they wanted to hear about iraq, she said(her own words) that the first priority of the first hundred hours, and in fact they were ALL spent that way, was to reinstall power, otherwise known as tax and spend. No sober, sane individual could possibly believe that someone that well known for financing and harboring terrorists loyal to Iran as assad is, wouldnt have staged such and event. Assad doesnt weaken to any pressure or diplomacy and does nothing without his special interest being front row center. After 757gate. and granting congressional voting rights to non taxpaying liberal us territories in direct violation of the consitution, you have to have little to no understanding at all of domestic politics to beleive this woman has and will do any good at all for the american public.
Obvoiusly you were a clinton supporter and my final comment is more true than ever in this situation...those who dont learn from history are condemmed to repeat it.
2007-04-06 14:12:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by koalatcomics 7
·
4⤊
5⤋
No, I think a better analogy would be Nancy "the Benedict Arnold" Pelosi
2007-04-06 14:12:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
4⤋
Wow, this is the 20th time I've heard this analogy.
How original.
Next time do a answer search.
2007-04-06 14:06:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by SemperFi 2
·
5⤊
1⤋
The next administration, ( and it won't be a Republican one) is going to have Chanel's of communication and dialog set in motion to repair some of the damage of the previous one. We have a lot of cleaning up to do.
2007-04-06 14:46:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
Lmao,great call,of course the liberals will have to google Chamberlain to figure it out.
Knowing them..,they will probably look under Wilt Chamberlain.lol
2007-04-06 14:03:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by jnwmom 4
·
5⤊
5⤋
Sure if you can get Georgie W. Bush to change his name to fit his lifestyle. Get him to change his name to Dopey like the dumbbell from the seven dwarfs and that would probably get Nancy to change her name too.
2007-04-06 14:09:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
So is the whole party. Democrats are traitors. I look forward to another 8 years of a Republican in the White House. We will also get back the Congress next year
2007-04-06 14:04:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Chainsaw 6
·
6⤊
6⤋