Do you know what the eight fired federal prosecutors had in common?

Question

Since everyone else can post "questions" that are not really questions, I might as well post mine. You may respond as you wish...

Now, I'm not one who's seduced by "conspiracy theories," but I found it extremely fascinating that ALL EIGHT OF THEM declined to press obscenity charges on cases that the DOJ was desperately running up a flagpole without success.

Now, why? — since we know these prosecutors are Republicans who would love to win a solid case— why would they frown on pursuing such charges?

Bush's DOJ Porno Task Force told the prosecutors to go after X-rated entertainment companies who make adult, consensual productions—grown-ups with contracts!

But those 8 justices weren't all that stupid, and they knew what happens in obscenity trials when you go after the 1st Amendment. They could paper the White House with case history.

For the rest of this posting, click my profile and blog link.

Answer 1

It's pretty easy to understand that the Bush White House wanted to use the Justice department federal prosecutors to create seed stories that Carl Rove could use to manufacture "talking points" for pro-Republican anti-Democrat news articles.

Most people can see this. The die-hard Bush supporters don't care about that, though. They are too tuned in to that same talking-point broadcast to stop trumpeting "Clinton fired 93' as if firing them at the start of a presidency compares to these firings. And every recent president has fired all of them at start of term - including Bush.