2007-04-06 13:38:36 · 11 answers · asked by stevemxusa 6 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Absolutely Nothing!
(Huh! Good God y'all!)
2007-04-06 13:45:01 · answer #1 · answered by dreamed1 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Historically, the struggles and tragedies of war have brought out the greatness in industries and countries, we have many galiant and noble hero's who have done us all a great service, the statesmanship of Winston Churchill galvanized England in World War II. War reminds us of our mortality, the importance of family, the freedoms we take for granted as citizens and with the benefit of hindsight, it makes clear good and evil, like the German Reich's treachery towards Jews. War keeps us on are knees and makes us hope their is indeed a Higher Power that can triumph over related poverty and diseases. This is what War is good for.
2007-04-06 14:18:38 · answer #2 · answered by mark_hensley@sbcglobal.net 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is good to go to war against President Bush and his administrations and renounce him and his works in the nation and world. It is good to war against our troops being in foriegn lands we want not of any and whose welcomes are hostile and against us, good to war to bring them home and set them as guards against illegals at the borders and in the land.It is good to preserve and restore the past and make right the wrongs that some say, oh it cannot be repaired and some say, we can never go back to that way and others say you wont work america, it is good to wake america with war to work and close our borders against all imigrants of all nations. It is good to war against ones fat and blubber, and the sins we all have more and less, weakness and it is good to war to be able to lift up a brother and lift up a sister and set pride in the father and mother, these are good wars.
2007-04-06 14:03:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fighting evil. Ending slavery in America. Freeing oppressed countries. etc.
I'm sad that Hitler wasn't anti-war. But I'm damned glad Franklin Roosevelt wasn't anti-war.
2007-04-06 13:41:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Stimulating a nation's economy.
Population control.
Keeping terrorists fighting our soldiers on other people's real estate.
2007-04-06 13:46:36 · answer #5 · answered by Catherine B 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
for destroying territory finding new enemies and yeah
2007-04-06 17:05:11 · answer #6 · answered by cutenhotchick12 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i guess to a point if you have to defend yourself if the other side decides not too.
2007-04-06 14:24:28 · answer #7 · answered by havingfun 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush can answer you that question because I have no idea.
2007-04-06 13:47:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Senseless killings. Nothing more nothing less.
2007-04-06 13:53:41 · answer #9 · answered by Williamstown 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
good for business.
2007-04-06 14:26:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋