English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

There isn't any solution to that one. More troops will only increase the violence and senseless killings.

2007-04-06 13:13:27 · answer #1 · answered by Williamstown 5 · 2 2

Uh...no.

Not unless you call the link below "quelling the violence and ending the killings..."?

2007-04-06 21:33:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes, if we can bomb the out of them.
& secure those sites Heavy with activity.
But forces need Armor etc & the Crazy Democrats wont Fund those needs thus lose more forces Needlesly.
ThanksPelosi& allies.
Thanks.
Our dead vets say Thanks since Vietnam War.

Solution to Iraqi Violence:
1. Stop Iran from funding forces.
2. Assissinations of leaders.
3. ID leaders & remove.
4. Bounty for groups.
5. Bomb the place.
Or nothing changes.

2007-04-06 20:09:07 · answer #3 · answered by STEPHEN R 5 · 1 3

not if the flip flop harry reid recently started takes effect. cutting funding and leaving the soldiers dangling is cold hard cowardice...no more and no less and tie 27 billion to the funding bill is totally absurd...the pelosi/reid regime ought to be tried for treason.

2007-04-06 20:07:51 · answer #4 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 1 2

I hope so. Don't you hope so?

I want to win the war on terror. Don't you want that?

I don't know what your position is, but I know there are lots of people out there who would rather see the terrorists win than see George Bush win. That is messed up.

2007-04-06 20:26:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Liberalism will always opt for defeat and appeasement, or havent any of you been paying attention?

2007-04-06 21:24:28 · answer #6 · answered by dave b 6 · 1 1

no, it will enhance it.

2007-04-06 21:34:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers