I think it depends on the content and the ultimate use the book is targeted for. In my opinion I believe that there will always be some need for printed material
For example:
1.) Printed catalogs are easier to browse through by flipping through pages. Althought web sites electronic catalogs allow browsing it is much slower and electronic browsing is still relying on an individual to sort of know what they are looking for and that the individual has the ability to properly describe a search term.... So a printed catalog would have an edge in capturing an impulse sale where an individual happens upon an item they were really not looking for but end up purchasing.
2.) People read for entertainment and relaxation. Take a book to the beach or read on bed for example. Some how I don't think I would end up dragging an electronic device to either of these locations
3.) Printed manual have the advantage of being turned to a page and always kept inview while doing an activity. If your following an instruction or help screen on a PC you know the frustration of always tabbing back and forth between screens when following a proceedure.... I suppose this also parallels #2 in that you wouldn't necessarily drag your laptop based engine manual into the garage while you do a tune up or want to place your greasy hands on a key board or touchscreen....
4.) Printed manuals never have power issues... Think of that if you need to read a generator manual during the next power failure...
Electronic books do have an advantage for publishing technical and reference material. The search capabilities of an electronic medium far out shine any printed index. Also electronic publushing allows for multimedia illustrations and video. Video illustration of a proceedure is superior to a few snap shots printed in a book.
Electronic based information is easier to distribute and revise than its printed counterpart.
Electronic infomation is compact compared to books ect...
2007-04-06 14:48:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by MarkG 7
·
5⤊
1⤋
It will take quite a while. A couple of years ago, Steven King release a book in e-format. I was really psyched about it. It was not easy to read. My Handspring was too small to read more than a few sentences at a time, my computer was trapped at a desk, and I didn't have a laptop at the time. I ended up printing some of the chapters and reading them on paper.
When they start making reasonably priced e-readers with good screen-size, there will be movement toward it.
2007-04-06 13:45:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
No.... no longer via fact of convenience... that's basically a remember of time till now laptops are lighter and extra handy that sure paper... rather it is going to likely be via fact of sentiment... that's the comparable reasoning that compels me to have a record participant and extra information than CDs....
2016-12-15 18:15:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think audio books (rather than e-books) will replace printed books because it is difficult to read off of a computer. When you read a paper book, you can't do anything else, but when you listen to audio books you can multi task
2007-04-06 12:40:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by sunnydaydreame 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
overtime, overall yes
but there will always be some people without devices to listen to these books and some people who just like written material better
2007-04-06 12:38:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes it will. I am in the military and we are already starting to do this. It saves on paper and a whole lot cheaper to update the information.
2007-04-06 12:36:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by AlexWallace23 2
·
1⤊
3⤋