Is it because we're that inherently different ?
or
What ?
There are many reasons that I can think of, but they all kinda refer back to possibly being inherently different in our beliefs, thoughts, and actions . What is it ?
2007-04-06
11:06:08
·
36 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Argle Gargle Wargle Bargle Cargill - First off , thanks for the directions yesterday !! I really appreciate it . Secondly , . . . Did you listen to the British sailors talk about being blind-folded and hearing rifles cocking behind their heads ?
I did , and I'd call that mistreatment !!
2007-04-06
11:27:03 ·
update #1
We think in practical terms. Libs protest to make themselves feel good. We try to focus on things that will really make a difference.
2007-04-07 09:07:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
15⤊
1⤋
Good question - I guess we have better things to do with our time. I'm not even sure half the libs out there even know what they're really protesting about - they just know their party is against something so they scream as loud as they can. Of course, they couldn't handle it if we started protesting things - they'd find some way to twist it around and make us look bad - that's all they can do. They're a dying breed - Air America doesn't even have the listeners to stay on the air in most markets. There aren't many libs left - they just cry a lot so they get a lot of attention.
2007-04-06 13:58:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Roland'sMommy 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
It is an actual mental problem
Liberal Dem's just have a need to be contrary to anything considered normal or moral
and protesting in the streets and burning flags is about as contrary to normal and morality as it gets
That's why no Rep's out protesting in the streets and burning flags as We are Moral and Normal
Won't hear how the Iranians were mistreating the British as they are against anything America/British and are for anything anti-America/British, So they will side with our enemies
as long as they are against America
2007-04-08 03:57:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I have protested but not constantly like some libs. Plus this answer shows libs out of touch with reality thinking only Reps are rich and no poor/middle class Rep/Conservatives. I have met alot in my life. My grandmother grew up poor but was always a Republican because of their issues.
2007-04-07 03:12:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by ALASPADA 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Conservatives tend to hold more traditional values and generally prefer a more silent majority. They speak with their votes. I find it rather amusing that many of most extreme liberals I have met over the years refuse to vote period. In short conservatives believe in the system. They believe that the people do still have the power if they choose to exercise it. Liberals by and large do not appear to believe in the system and thus choose a different tact which they believe will get more notice. They are correct in the getting noticed part because the media loves to cover controversy. It sells! I don't think either method is right or wrong, I just think conservatives and liberals are wired differently.
2007-04-06 11:21:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Bryan 7
·
9⤊
1⤋
I could desire to assert you have a splash of something to thrill absolutely everyone there. How do you sense with regards to the CCP? they have murdered tens of millions in China yet they're our 2d greatest paying for and merchandising important different after Canada. it truly is form of difficult to assist regulation and order without government till you assume absolutely everyone to easily be chuffed campers everywhere all the time. And with regulation and order you too may be a criminal if the draft have been ever reinstated and it may desire to could desire to be if modern-day developments proceed. If we are attacked, not in common terms one or 2 homes, I mean ATTACKED our modern-day militia could we way out-gunned and out-manned. Ron Paul is a nut case who thinks doing not something and letting our worldwide banking equipment to "self suited" is a thank you to circulate in spite of if it potential billions starve via no fault of their very own. i don't have self belief in a God, yet will shield your top to have self belief to the death. i assume your a type of anarchist who desire no government, yet desire all the advantages a central authority has to furnish. in my view i could desire the Republicans over your stance and that i'm what many call a bleeding coronary heart Liberal. do not trouble nonetheless. you will finally strengthen up and verify how issues certainly paintings and there is not one damned element you're able to do approximately it till you strike it incredibly, fabulously, wealthy or detect a genie in a bottle someplace.
2016-10-02 07:17:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, we are very different from the liberal Democrats. We never properly learned the use of the annoying whiny voice or the art of constantly talking over anyone who may have a different idea. We know who our fathers are. We've never been comfortable with outright lying the way that the Dem libs are, and worst of all, we tend to bathe and get haircuts regularly.
2007-04-06 12:01:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
Democrats are similar to their "kinfolk" from the slave trading days-oppressing civil rights and denying everyone who is not one of them the freedoms they enjoyed. **They are opposed to any measure made by republicans which does not advocate their belief system regardless of whether it is best for the whole!**Like Lincoln, I believe republicans are more interested inpreserving the "Republic" of America than succeeding in personal grandizement and politcal intrigue. People who stir the pot ALL the time, are the bad apples of our society, republican, democrat, libertarian, independent alike.
I am looking for any candidates who are not mukrakers!
I found some facts on one of my politcal Heroes: Abraham Lincoln:: ENJOY.
*********************************************
As an outspoken opponent of the expansion of slavery and a political leader in the western states, he won the Republican Party nomination in 1860 and was elected president later that year.
Lincoln helped preserve the United States by leading the defeat of the secessionist Confederacy in the American Civil War.
Historians conclude he brilliantly handled the factions of the Republican Party by bringing the leaders into his cabinet and forcing them to cooperate.
In crisis management, he defused a war scare with Britain (1861), he outmaneuvered the Confederacy and took control of the border slave states in 1861-62, and he managed his own landslide reelection in the 1864 presidential election.
Ranked among the top three U.S. Presidents, with the average of those surveys placing him at number one. He is noted for his lasting influence on U.S. politics, including redefining republican values.[1]
The American version of republicanism was formed by the Founding Fathers in the 18th century and was based on English models as well as Roman and European ideas. It formed the basis for the American Revolution, the Declaration of Independence (1776) and the Constitution (1787), as well as critical statements from Abraham Lincoln and others. It is not the same as democracy, for republicanism asserts that people have inalienable rights that cannot be voted away by a majority of voters; the two political philosophies have influenced but do not literally define their political party namesakes, the Democratic Party and the Republican Party.
2007-04-06 11:27:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
Perhaps we hold our beliefs much deeper and don't see why we shouldn't protest directly. It's a time honored practice on both sides actually. It was since Nam that cons don't do it much.
No drugs or mistreatment of the Brit Sailors eh? Another one bites the dust.
2007-04-06 11:18:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Conservative Republicans do protest, but it's usually more violent confrontation. Since Grant, it's been hard for a Republican to march without a gun in his hand.
If you're right wing and you enjoy protesting, become a Libertarian. The first protests I've ever seen where Libertarians in Arizona who didn't like Clinton's anti-gun laws.
Conservatives do protest outside Abortion clinics and even a few did outside Disney and a few other places, but now that Bush is in charge they don't feel the need to as much. Wait till another Democrat comes in.
2007-04-06 12:17:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by dude 5
·
1⤊
7⤋
Back when Clinton was Pres I seem to remember many occasions when the Republican congress walked out and stalled the functioning of government. I would call that a form of protest. I'm thinking whoever feels like the unappreciated underdog (lib/con, Rep/Dem) will protest. I found it interesting that the conservative Republicans were so good at perpetuating the underdog persona for so long after taking control of all branches of our federal government.
2007-04-06 11:18:23
·
answer #11
·
answered by socrates 6
·
1⤊
6⤋