2007-04-06 09:11:39 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
It doesn't matter who came first, it matters that they both did.
2007-04-06 09:16:27 · answer #1 · answered by Beth B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The egg. Over the course of evolution, the animal that came before the chicken would have had to lay an egg, and from that egg would have come the first chicken.
As in, an egg would have been laid somewhere that contained the first chicken that had evolved FROM a chicken-something into a pure chicken as we see them today.
2007-04-06 16:18:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In order for there to be an egg then the chicken came first.
2007-04-06 19:39:10 · answer #3 · answered by cswint2000 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Chickens are the result of mutation.
The egg is first, from what, who knows?
2007-04-06 16:16:54 · answer #4 · answered by Telemon 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
There was a feathered saurian that laid an egg on a natural uranium outcrop. The radiated and mutated embryo that hatched and matured then laid eggs and had offspring that eventually evolved into chickens.
2007-04-06 16:20:31 · answer #5 · answered by Terry 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd say egg. Dinosaurs were hatched and they were on Earth before chickens.
2007-04-06 16:16:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Eggs evolved long long before chickens, or birds even.
Consider that FISH lay eggs.
2007-04-06 16:14:38 · answer #7 · answered by Elana 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
egg
2007-04-06 16:15:41 · answer #8 · answered by Alan 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
egg
2007-04-06 16:14:52 · answer #9 · answered by Mayonaise 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Neither. Life on earth evolved from bacteria more than 3 billion years ago.
2007-04-06 20:00:26 · answer #10 · answered by Annie 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋