Will our enemies see weakness in the US after Nancys cherade, the way Bin Laden did with Clinton?

Question

Alessa is quite the spelling scholar, thats one positive thing you can say about her comment!

Answer 1

I don't get it...where's the "personal attack" other than by lefty groupies trying to ridicule every Q. asked by someone with a conservative POV?

The fact is that the Q being asked is a mainstream media issue today. I happen to agree that an unauthorized mission to negotiate with a regime that supports terrorism throughout the Middle East does convey a message of weakness at home.

Perhaps the liberal lapdogs (cats?) have an opinion, but we'll never know it. They can't get past the urge to ridicule.

Shame.

Answer 2

In the middle east, women are regarded as lower than dogs. They have no regard or respect for women, so to have a women come and kiss their behind, was probably looked upon as a good joke and sign of our weakness by Syria. I bet they can't wait for Hillary to get elected. If you think Bin Laden made Bill look bad...........

Answer 3

Even the average American who is not politically active understands that middle-eastern culture is different.
There is absolutely no way they could view Nan's traitorous quest as anything other than American weakness. Treason is described as giving aid and comfort to the enemy.. Nan did EXACTLY that. Her visit to a nation that the entire world knows sponsors terrorism undermines everything America believes in... She absolutely sold out America's future for a few paltry votes... We will ALL pay a price for years to come.

Answer 4

While I truly believe that Mr. Bush's failure to sink all those billions into other ventures when the money would have been MUCH better spent finding Osama Bin Laden & crushing Al Qaeda is the greatest weakness that our enemies view, Nancy Pelosi's charade seems to just show them a willingness to start a dialogue.

I hope that the billions Mr. Bush has spent so far don't seem to have broken down the barriers to terrorism that existed before, showing our enemies an opening of not simply weakness, but also ineptitude and near stupidity, yet I'm afraid that the idea's beginning to grow on me.

Is Bin Laden actually more glad to have Mr. Bush in office than another leader who would be more diligent to keep him on the run?

Answer 5

Blah blah blah. You cons and libs are all of the comparable. Whining approximately one yet another's regulations of administration of the Empire. that's on its way out. Your intramural (and rather lowbrow) disputes over who gets to be godfather can no longer conceal the undeniable fact that the international capitalist racket is contracting. 0.33 value huckster armies from a u . s . a . whose capitalists deindustrialized THEMSELVES can no longer maintain a international protection stress dictatorship lots longer. interior the intervening time, fool spokesmodels for the present emperor's faction like ol' Joe biden are sure to assert some stupid issues. regardless of the undeniable fact that, your question proves that he's not any longer the stupidest or maximum cheating of political commentators around.

Answer 6

First of all, Bush decided not to go after the terrorists responsible for bombing the USS Cole, and that would have emboldened terrorists much more than anything Clinton ever did.

Secondly, we attacked Iraq, a country that had nothing to do with 9/11, and hardly had anything to do with terrorism. We did this based on lies and obviously false intelligence. If that is all it takes then God help us when the terrorists figure that one out.

Thirdly, I think isolating Syria and Iran is going to work about as well as it did in North Korea. You know, the isolation that resulted in a Nuclear test by that country.

Answer 7

No doubt about it, she is showing the entire "religion of peace" that we are weak. It's part of the Muslim war plan against America. Nancy (as with all Libs) are the target audience that saves them time, money and lives. How? They no that American liberals will win the war for them without having to purchase high tech weapons, mobilizing millions or suffering a substantial life loss- it's as simple as keeping the U.S. military death count rising and the "American mother" will stop the war and inhibit our nations ability to fight a war the way a war should be fought. You don't win a war on terror by negotiation, you win a war on terror by killing terrorists!

Answer 8

Not weakness in the entire USA, but they will see weakness in the Democrat party ... which is nothing new, mid east dictators and terrorists have preferred the democrat leadership to republican administration since 2001. The mid east knows that they can make deals with weak-willed democrats who are willing to capitulate to the demands of islamofascist regimes, whereas the Bush administration has a hardline approach to attacking islamofascists and their interests.

For those who claim that Pelosi was in Syria for "diplomatic" purposes. We tried 12 years of diplomacy with Iraq, and look where that inevitably ended. The truth is diplomacy only works when both sides can be trusted to play by the rules. Terrorists and dictators are inherently untrustworthy; the only way to deal with these kind of people is at the end of a machine gun.

Answer 9

Maybe,

That or they will see a confused populace. They may see a fractured nationalism that cant support a mod us operand em. They may also see a sleeping dragon. If the US was truly motivated to act, our country can still be quite the super power globally.

Answer 10

Well DUH??? Why would they take a woman seriously? Especially a Dem woman? They love the dems, due to the fact they walk all over them, and they hate women period. Hopefully they REALIZE it was against our Great administrations wishes that she felt worthy enough to speak on our behalf. Personally I think that since she broke the law, she should go to prison. But as the libs all think she should be able to appologize and all will be forgiven.