English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

list format plz

2007-04-06 07:22:18 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

Doppest, forget physics, I'm in loveeeeeeeeeeeeeeee ;-)

Likely this is some dude messing with my head.

2007-04-06 09:42:56 · update #1

7 answers

Nothing, just redshift and the fact that you can build a theory around it (which isn't evidence).

The Cosmic background radiation is NOT evidence of expansion; it's merely evidence that once upon a time the universe was filled with nearly uniform light-noise; and that point was further back in time than the extent of the observable universe, so we're still receiving it.

2007-04-06 07:35:51 · answer #1 · answered by KevinStud99 6 · 0 0

There is nothing else that will tell us that the universe is expanding.
this leaves us with the possibility that the red shift is incorrectly interpreted and the universe is not expanding.
An accelerated expansion of the universe makes no sense,it is a finite entity and is limited to a maximum size

2007-04-06 11:02:46 · answer #2 · answered by Billy Butthead 7 · 0 0

The redshift is the only direct evidence. It isn't just the fact that there is a redshift, it is that the more distant a galaxy the greater its redshift that paints a picture of general expansion of the universe.

2007-04-06 07:39:59 · answer #3 · answered by campbelp2002 7 · 0 0

The frequency of the cosmic background radiation is direct evidence.

2007-04-06 07:27:08 · answer #4 · answered by Gene 7 · 0 0

Apart from the fact that tendentious questions continue to be posed over your name, what evidence do we have for YOUR existence?!

2007-04-06 07:52:14 · answer #5 · answered by Dr Spock 6 · 0 0

the gaps between galaxies are stretching

2007-04-06 07:50:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

My pants don't fit any more.

2007-04-06 07:30:36 · answer #7 · answered by hvykey 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers