Yes, unfortunately I do believe it. Bush and Cheney still persist in thinking that the American people are ignorant and uninformed. Sadly, they are right but it only applies to one group, those who blindly follow them over every cliff. If Cheney or Bush says it then it MUST be true, who needs evidence or even God forbid, who needs to look at all the evidence that proves he's full of ****. That would just be too much for their followers to handle, it's better for them to just keep sucking sand and believe that by doing so they are somehow more patriotic than the rest of us.
EDIT: I continue to get a kick of those idiots who can't answer anything that proves to be Republican b.s. without citing Clinton as their defense. Is that sad or what? Yes, Virginia, Clinton believed a lot of things. What did he do because there wasn't enough hard evidence? He used containment and -- shock! -- it worked. George Bush attacked instead and found containment was actually working. That must really burn his butt...
EDIT: And Libkilla is full of crap, imagine that. The 9/11 report said no such thing. Here is what they actually said:
Responding to a presidential tasking, Clarke's office sent a memo to Rice on September 18, titled "Survey of Intelligence
Information on Any Iraq Involvement in the September 11 Attacks." Rice's chief staffer on Afghanistan, Zalmay Khalilzad, concurred in its conclusion that only some anecdotal evidence linked Iraq to al Qaeda. The memo found no "compelling case" that Iraq had either planned or perpetrated the attacks. Arguing that the case
for links between Iraq and al Qaeda was weak, the memo pointed out that Bin Ladin resented the secularism of Saddam Hussein's regime. Finally, the memo said, there was no confirmed reporting on Saddam cooperating with Bin Ladin on unconventional weapons.62
http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/index.htm
2007-04-06 07:30:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
To tell you the truth no I didn't. I thought this was a joke. Then I pressed on the link you provided. Unfortunately you were telling the truth. Shows how gullible I am.
I just figured they had given up on this a long time ago. Now in hindsight, I am reminded what lying scum Bush/Cheney are. They are of course preaching to the converted. Only people in complete denial will continue to believe the Al-Qaida and Saddam connection. Those people are mindless sheep. They are MUCH more gullible than I am.
2007-04-06 07:37:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Aren't you the same people that want more answers about 9/11? Aren't you the same people that want to investigate our President for any number of crimes. Why should we stop looking for answers, why shouldn't we follow all leads? Why should we stop trying to find those that back terrorists.
So fact that Zarqawi lived in Baghdad, that's just Cheney making things up. But the Pentagon report that has Saddam and a couple of his aides saying "we never met the guy", that is undeniable empirical evidence huh?
Try gettin on the team pal.
2007-04-06 07:32:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Cheney is amazingly good at rousing the backside along with his propaganda. He nows that they are going to have confidence even though comes out of his mouth,in spite of even though if it has any foundation fairly He makes outrageous comments that many have confidence bcause they are so outrageous,the reason being if it weren't real,why could he say it interior the 1st place. it rather is the classic propaganda gadget familiar as "the super lie",and Cheney isn't something if no longer a huge liar..
2016-10-21 05:09:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is a typical response from Cheney. Bull-eaded ,stubborn,
and he will never admit he was wrong. It disgusts me.
Pusherhombre here's the latest-
Despite a newly declassified Pentagon report concluding there was no direct cooperation between Saddam Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda, Dick Cheney remains convinced there was.
2007-04-06 07:30:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Global warming ain't cool 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Abu Musab al Zarqawi had training camps in Iraq prior to America's invasion. It is in the 911 report.
2007-04-06 07:34:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Cheney = Halliburton.
Halliburton is the oil company in charge of "rebuilding" Iraq.
With Saddam out of power and a grateful successor in, Cheney will hold onto his dreams. They're coming true!
2007-04-06 07:24:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Suze 6
·
4⤊
3⤋
Coming from Cheney? Sure. You think he's ever going to actually admit that the Iraqi war was a fraud to make it look like we're doing something about terrorism (while getting his friends in the oil business rich)?
2007-04-06 07:24:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by JeffyB 7
·
5⤊
2⤋
Got to give it to the Dick, he's consistent: He never met a lie he didn't like.
Can I believe it?
Why SURE!
2007-04-06 12:59:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by tehabwa 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I wish you would decide , one day the Pentagon,s word is
Gospel and the next day, Their word not to be trusted.
2007-04-06 07:22:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋