English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

PAROLE OFFICER TOLD HIM HE CANT BE WITH HIS KID IT WILL VIOLATE HIS PAROLE HE CANT BE WITH HIS KID FOR THE NEXT 3 YEARS WHY OR LIVE WITH ANY MINOR HE IS NOT A CHESTER BUT USED AND SOLD DRUGS HE DID 4 YEARS AND NEEDS TO DO 3ON PAROLE

2007-04-06 07:08:23 · 5 answers · asked by IZZY 1 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

5 answers

Because he's a lawbreaker and because he used and sold drugs which are a danger to his kid and anyone else he might live with. Sorry, but the law is the law! "If you don't want to do the time, don't do the crime" -- Baretta.

2007-04-06 07:13:21 · answer #1 · answered by MH/Citizens Protecting Rights! 5 · 0 0


Look at his sentencing order. There may be specific restrictions on being around minors, although generally only crimes against minors specifically restrict one from being around minors in the future.

If the order is silent, then check with his defense lawyer. There may be a state or local law that imposes this restriction.

The parole office may be confused. Some states say that selling drugs within XX feet of a school enhances the crime, but that does not mean that someone convicted of such a crime cannot be around minors.

If all these fail, go back to court and ask the judge to say specifically that he can have contact with his child.

Of course, there may be a completely unrelated reason, like a protective order filed by the mother, or some investigation going on that he's not telling you about.

2007-04-06 14:17:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

it depends on what the judge and/or the laws of the state say. My guess is that he was caught or believed to have been selling drugs to children or using kids to sell them. Or the state feels they have an interest in not allowing a felon to influence a young mind...this is more of a stretch.

2007-04-06 15:10:47 · answer #3 · answered by Dr. Luv 5 · 0 0

That is common with people with drug charges. They don't want the child exposed to them if he lapses back into drugs again. However, he may be allowed to see the child under supervised conditions. It will have to be court-ordered by a judge, though, so talk to an attorney.

2007-04-06 14:19:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I would know but if he can show them within a year that he will stay out of trouble he can see his children get a job go to work and they will see that you doing the right thing

2007-04-06 14:12:30 · answer #5 · answered by Linda 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers