Who do you side with, Geraldo Rivera or Bill?
2007-04-06 06:42:11 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
ok...but what about the fact that the majority of the drunk drivers out there are U.S. citizens and only a tiny minute of them are illegal....it would not have made a story if the person was not illegal...because he was, it hit headlines. I have had two friends of mine, FEMALE, die from being hit by a rich, Anglo Saxon, U.S. citizen, and well known man in South Texas and it didn't make national news. It was very tragic because nothing happened to him. Where is the justice there. So don't go and give me that kind of crap.
2007-04-07 05:35:00 · update #1
Hard issue there... Bill pi$$ed me off so bad I had to change channels...and I watch Fox a lot....just not a lot of Bill.
Personally, I think they were both wrong for acting like a couple of school yard kids. There was nothing civil about that discussion at all.
Both had excellent points to start...although I can't say what all of them were. I changed channels.
2007-04-06 07:32:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Didn't watch it, but heard the exchange today. I'd have to put my vote behind O'Reilly. Rivera has a long-standing history of ignoring the problems created by illegal immigrants. There is a disproportionate number of vehicular accidents, especially associated with alcohol, among illegal immigrants. What's worse, this wasn't the first time for the guy that did this. He should have been deported the first time. Our government is failing us on this issue. And it's not racism when its true. I'd be saying the same thing if any group of illegals had the same track record.
2007-04-06 08:12:06 · answer #2 · answered by kathy_is_a_nurse 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That was all a setup. They planned it. Bill is right. He shouldn't have been in the country much less on the street driving drunk. It is funny how O'Reilly gets under many of your liberal skin. You people hate a taste of your own medicine. Cracks me up. Remember this..... There is a reason he has a bigger audience than any other cable news station. The guy makes ABSOLUTE sense most of the time.
2007-04-06 07:24:50 · answer #3 · answered by Shawn P 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I side with Bill, but it was an idiotic argument.
Geraldo's premise was weak and faulty. This would still have been a story regardless of whether the man was illegal based on sanctuary laws. John Cooey was not an illegal alien, neither is Pat Cashman, the Vermont judge. But Geraldo does not stand for anarchy.
2007-04-06 06:53:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
From this write-up by potential of invoice Oreilly relating to the Obama interview, curiously like invoice replaced into fairly inspired with the guy. He calls him "self-valuable, desperate and pushed", "no longer common yet careful", and "a real person." sounds like invoice, regularly a bulldog, has numerous wonderful issues to assert approximately Obama.
2016-10-21 05:05:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who watches Bill O'reilly anyway? Its all about the Daily Show and Colbert report,
2007-04-06 07:02:26 · answer #6 · answered by 00666 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
When I want utterly slanted, biased, self-aggrandizing disengenuous rhetoric I listen to Kim Jung Il.
2007-04-06 06:58:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
would have sided with Bill. either we are a nation of laws or we are a failure. if the man was deported as the law called for the two girls would be alive today.
2007-04-06 06:52:34 · answer #8 · answered by rap1361 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I can pull out crap out of my *** that is more credible, why waste my time with O'Reichly
2007-04-06 07:49:16 · answer #9 · answered by Jose R 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bill O'Reily and the O'Reily Factor are always good for a good laugh.
2007-04-06 06:53:10 · answer #10 · answered by This Is Not Honor 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋