this is a definition of terrorist given to me by a conservative.
(not that i agree with this defintion)
but according to it is george bush not a terrorist?
Define terrorist: A terrorist is an individual who brings "terror" upon a society or individual (or any living thing for that matter) A terrorist can come in different nationalities, Religious backgrounds and Gender!! They can terrorize in several different manners it isn't limited to hijacking planes, or bombing buildings. A terrorist can do just as much damage behind the scenes than in the public eye.
2007-04-06
06:01:58
·
22 answers
·
asked by
bluebear
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
sadaam was "president" of iraq...would you aregue that he was not a terrorist, leadership and national origin have nothing to do with being or not being a terrorist.
and if one is made a creep simply by asking, this is a sad and autocratic coutry we live in. you tw@t.
2007-04-06
06:09:46 ·
update #1
i assumed you were a conservative, i was right, was it luck? you assume my opinion when i have not stated it, are you right? would it have been luck?
2007-04-06
07:46:42 ·
update #2
oh yeah, sarcastic mind, nice source. what do we bomb? who do we kill? i am not saying i think george bush is a terrorist, i am asking for an argument one way or the other.
it seems ridiculous to apply a variant standard for definition of terrorist, yet there is one, why? answer that question. don't muck about with "begging the question." from the standpoint of those that we deem "terrorist," their bombings are military operations, from our standpoint, it is terrorist. when we bomb something it is part of a military operation, to those we bomb what are they?
just a question, i am NOT stating an opinion.
if i were liberal i would explain why a assert that he is a terrorist, based on understood definitions of terrorist.
if i were conservative i would defend this logically with a pragmatism that should be evident within a pro war ideology. i would explain why he is not a terrorist.
2007-04-06
07:54:04 ·
update #3
You are apparently unable to differentiate between terrorists & those who oppose them. Therapy might help you.
2007-04-06 06:06:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
13⤊
3⤋
If you feel George Bush is a Terrorist you have that right and so do others, I feel that the Democratic Party and Liberals are terrorist and I have that right, they bring terror in my heart thinking of how they could destroy the country I love.. If you don't agree that's fine I don't care.. But one things for certain Saddam was a Terrorist he did carry out attacks against his own people, if you argue he wasn't you are missing some common sense some where.
I support Bush and I don't care if you do or not, I just don't agree with you and that's something I can live with.
The definintion as "open ended" as it is, is an accurate one. Terrorist can not be limited to one singe type of person or group of people, we have American Terrorist . Example: Timoty Mcvay was indeed a terrorist. David Koresh was looked at as a terrorist to many.. I could go on and on.. but I think you get my point.
I'm just saying I am not going to down your opinion, because you have a reason to believe what you do weather it's with facts or just feelings..
And I have a reason to believe what I do!!!
Besides all of that, I have to know!!! the question you asked that I gave that answer to was the very first one I've done, how do you automatically assume I'm a conservative from that 1 question?
2007-04-06 06:21:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think he is a terrorist in the same sense the suicide bombers are but I do think he has friends in low places (rich...but low morality). I think the people he has had contact with growing up and around his family really believe they are deserving of more than the average person. They are entitled to certain perks because of who they are.
If you'd like to understand why people in different economic classes behave as they do, read a book called "A framework for understanding poverty" by Ruby K. Payne Phd. In her book she dissects the low, middle and upper class behaviors and value systems that they operate from. It is a good read and it helps you understand the different viewpoints of each group, not necessarily agree with them, but understand them.
2007-04-06 06:15:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by suigeneris-impetus 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
George "keep fear alive" Bush isn't a terrorist? If that's true then Martin Luther King Jr. wasn't black. And St. Peter was a rabbit and the Hare Club for Men is real.
2007-04-06 06:11:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Alan S 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Gee, I guess in that case that every soldier, every
military person, every lieutenant or general, every
president and anyone who has ever threatened
their playmate or spouse is a "terrorist". Wow, we
sure have had a plausity of terrorists in this Nation
over the past years. Guess Bush is no different
than anyone else then, eh?
2007-04-06 06:09:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Wow!!! you're hurting. Bush has continually supported India, additionally. India is meant to be a Democracy. What are you whining approximately Bush, once you will desire to be working on your person u . s . a .. Do something on your person. I actually have a feeling which you do in contrast to your person u . s . a . of India, the two. something's no longer suited, right here.
2016-11-07 09:32:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. But what reason will you have to live once Bush is no longer in office. This constant obsession of him being a terrorist and all..
2007-04-06 06:06:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by jonepemberton 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Biggest Terrorist on the planet.
2007-04-06 14:17:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ugly Betty 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes. He terrorised his own people into supporting a war that was unjust and unfounded. He is always using fear to control and persuade people to support his actions. He also supports terrorists by providing arms to lunatic fringe groups to do his dirty work. He is a terrorist, no doubt about it.
2007-04-06 06:09:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Shakespeare 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
He is a terrorist to the real terrorists. So kinda.
2007-04-06 06:10:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by mbush40 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Definitely so. The man is responsible for killing many innocent people, both foreign and domestic.
2007-04-06 07:09:14
·
answer #11
·
answered by Mad Lizzy 2
·
2⤊
0⤋