2007-04-06 05:56:04 · 16 answers · asked by rjbotley@sbcglobal.net 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Probably because the Packers wouldn't trade Favre, he isn't worth a 2nd rounder at age 37 (Edgerrin James and Shaun Alexander couldn't get one two years ago, and they were in their prime) and they still might get Calvin Johnson.
2007-04-06 06:00:48 · answer #1 · answered by philliez01 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
specific!! thats what ive been asserting all alongside while u have a team that has desires all the way down the record, it makes maximum experience to draft the excellent participant and the participant that makes th maximum consequence on a team at any given element of a activity And David Carr isn't that undesirable. He did no longer play for a reliable team enjoying in front of him, in spite of the actuality that the region could look comparable if this subject got here approximately. unfavourable offensive line, no longer a delicate working back middle, and a reliable reciever, which little question Andre Johnson is and Calvin Johnson has the immdiate ability to be. I say take the excellent participant, that's little question Calvin Johnson. The Raiders will probable understand how plenty passing up that kind of ability would want back to hang-out them. the only question is that if the Raiders would desire to get him. they had probable would desire to promise they does no longer take a QB with their %., and taking this tep could likely make certain they take Johnson. that isn't take a seat properly with Randy Moss, who's already midway throughout the door. This creates a sacrifice for the Raiders. get rid of Moss to get Carr and Johnson. i think of this could be an incredible benefit to the Raiders, whether all of it starts with getting Carr. it is not promised he will come
2016-11-07 09:31:53 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Brett Favre is old, the Raiders want long-term, since they have no chance until 2009 or so. A better trade would be Randy Moss, Jerry Porter for Aaron Rodgers and a 4th Round pick.
2007-04-06 08:20:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Here's the answer no one wants randy moss because he's the biggest ****** in the NFL next to TO that is, favre is loyal to the packers and personally i think it would be a bad trade because favre has 5 to man seasons as it is.
2007-04-06 06:41:33 · answer #4 · answered by sailorvasheva 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry Raiders fans, but Brett Favre wouldn't disgrace himself in his last year in the NFL as a Raider. Plus, Randy Moss isn't worth it for the Packers. He's washed up, can't catch anymore (but tries to blame it on his relationship with the coach), and is a cancer in the locker room.
2007-04-06 06:12:30 · answer #5 · answered by Polamalu is God 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ditto to the first two answers -- and because I wouldn't want Randy Moss on my team, even if I got him for nothing. He is getting older and no longer has that extra step, and IMHO he is a cancer in the locker room, a coach-killer. Give me a guy with half his talent, who goes all-out every play.
2007-04-06 06:05:25 · answer #6 · answered by Barry B 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because for one thing, Brett Favre is the face of the Packers, and they wouldn't trade him, and he probably wouldn't play for anyone else...
2007-04-06 06:04:57 · answer #7 · answered by Terry C. 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why would the Raiders wat to trade for some washed up has been who should have retired two years ago? They are in the position to draft a young QB who will be a stud for years to come rather then get some oldie who is a interception machine. This is the worst proposed trade ever, makes no sense for the Raiders.
2007-04-06 06:18:05 · answer #8 · answered by Chris 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Favre wouldn't play for any team other than the Packers...dream on. He has such a dedication to that team and they have a dedication to him...pride of the franchise right there.
2007-04-06 06:05:18 · answer #9 · answered by Carolina Kitten 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because packers won't let favre go and also moss won't be any better in GB
2007-04-06 08:46:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋