And what's the big deal about her wearing a burka? I mean when a foriegn politician comes to the US and goes to a ball game and eats a hotdog, or visits disney world or something we love it.
I mean I've heard her called traitor... but isn't wearing traditional clothing from the country your visiting just a harmless gesture of respect?
I think the US could probly benefit by showing a little more respect and tolerance to other nations customs or beliefs.
2007-04-06 05:53:17 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I have two words for all of those who are saying it's because she's a woman Condoleeza Rice
2007-04-06 07:34:20 · update #1
the cons are deeply partisan.
laura bush wears a head scarf and no one cares, pelosi does it and she's a traitor.
on this visit to syria and saudi arabia pelosi is traveling with REPUBLICAN who are doing the exact same thing that she is doing and the administration is declining to criticize them.
they are transparantly partisan and care less and less about actually solving problems and getting things done and more and more about manipulating public opinion and fooling the public just in time for elections...
2007-04-06 05:59:45 · answer #1 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Nancy Pelosi is a traitor, and she puts her nose and opinions where she shouldn't.. Like bringing up Isreal to the Syrian's.. And the Burka didn't bother me at all, I understand and actually commend her for having the Respect to wear one.
2007-04-06 06:00:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
ummmm condie rice? she is presently protecting between the main advantageous positions ever held in American politics and likewise occurs to be African American... did anybody forget approximately that? Hillary is merely as shady as her slimy husband, you undergo in recommendations him the only with the unlawful land commerce, the ineffective agency companions and the only which grew to become the Oval workplace in to a sequence at a las Vegas on line casino... She have been given in to workplace on the ever so stained coat tails of her husband and cant even fess as much as the undeniable fact that up till the invasion she were commenting on the fact Iraq needed to be invaded to be sure Saddam did no longer have WMDs. And as for Pelosi, she is a a techniques left democrat from a a techniques left city. i understand because of the fact i lived close to San Fransisco all my existence and that i'm rather familiar together with her ideology and the politics of the individuals she represents. it has easily no longer something to do with the fact they are females, it has to do with what they symbolize. i does no longer recommendations having a woman as president, merely no longer Hillary. i do no longer recommendations the Democrat having a woman as speaker of the dwelling house, regardless of the undeniable fact that it could have been greater efficient if that they had put in a greater average voice. So please do no longer think of it has to do with intercourse, it does not. it has to do with the means to do the activity and what bags they deliver about with them. by potential of ways i admire how Liberal you're, I propose thats the occasion it rather is the good and careing occasion suitable? so good to understand your person very own bias isn't coloring your question or the representation of Conservatives which you recent. by potential of ways i understand why you forget approximately females like Rice... she does not slot in on your "undesirable little minority woman" mould, she actualy has a recommendations and is able to think of on her very own and not spew out Liberal biased rubbish. could force you loopy understanding that huh?
2016-10-21 04:57:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The burka is not a problem. In fact I want her to wear it while she is on the hill. Less of her to see. My problem with her besides the fact that her goal is to undermine the President, is the fact that she has lied. In her initial speech to congress she said she would look at each bill and remove pork and earmarks to cut spending. Have you seen the last bill she passed. Full of Pork. Which Nancy are we to believe?
2007-04-06 06:04:40 · answer #4 · answered by mbush40 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Going to Syria to mingle with the enemy after the President advised her not to go makes her a traitor. Almost treason. For her to open her hole and put words in Israels mouth makes her a liar.
2007-04-06 06:01:02 · answer #5 · answered by Slow Poke 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Nancy is an intelligent career woman with a position of power. Cons like their women at home, barefoot and in the kitchen baking cookies.
2007-04-06 05:59:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
She didn't wear a burka, she had a scarf on her head. My mother and grandmothers wore scarves on her heads when they went to catholic mass. What's the big deal?
But to answer your question, they attack Pelosi because they can't come up with any defense of Bush anymore.
2007-04-06 06:06:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Because she's a democrat. Conservatives and tolerance? Very funny.
2007-04-06 07:13:36 · answer #8 · answered by Mad Lizzy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because she's showing them up... but before we get all mushy over miss Pelosi. Remember that she's just removed legislation that would have mandated the president needing Congress's consent to move militarily in Iran...
so how righteous is she?
2007-04-06 05:59:03 · answer #9 · answered by sitizen_x 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I'd also like to think she'd remove her shoes in a Japanese household and not ask for a salami and cheese in a Jewish household or a hamburger in India....
Yes, it's basic respect and understanding of other cultures.
2007-04-06 05:59:15 · answer #10 · answered by Meg W 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋