English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I think Mitt Romney. I mean, come on! Hes just a dinky little dude from Massachusets! Theres absolutely no way hes gonna win against people like Barrack Obama, and Hillary Clinton!
Your input?

2007-04-06 05:21:42 · 24 answers · asked by ~ Lillie ~ 4 in Politics & Government Elections

Not to mention that he claims that he hunts, even says he is a "Lifelong hunter" even though hes only hunted 2 times?!

And hunting is sucha cruel, cruel "sport"! Why would anyone say they hunt!?

2007-04-06 05:23:43 · update #1

Are you kidding me?!
Hillary could win....she'd make a great president.

2007-04-06 05:28:51 · update #2

24 answers

I'm sorry you feel that way. I watched an interview with Mitt by Hannity, and it was compelling to see the way he composed himself on a number of issues. I was deeply impressed. Before you pass judgement, at least give yourself the chance to see him tested during a debate.

I also like Barack. I believe my vote will be between these two candidates.

2007-04-06 05:26:23 · answer #1 · answered by SirCharles 6 · 3 4

Mitt Romney is a perfect example of someone who went to a liberal occupied state and made the economy better. He's actually a smart man. He doesn't flip flop on issues.

I think Hillary Clinton would be the biggest joke of them all. At first she was for the War. Even at first when she first found out that Iraq had no WMDs she was still for the war. A year and half later she said she was not for the war. Then she changed her statement and said, " I voted for the war because Bush lied to me and decieved me about the WMDs" Also there is a video on youtube of Hillary saying just before the war started," I BELIEVE SADAM HUSSEIN IS AN EVIL MAN. I HAVE BEEN STUDYING THIS GUY FOR OVER 8 YEARS AND I HAVE CAME TO THE DETERMINATION FOR A LONG TIME NOW THAT HE NEEDS TO BE PUT OUT OF POWER." Hillary would later say we should have never invaded Iraq.

2007-04-06 05:31:14 · answer #2 · answered by tanisomega 2 · 5 0

I don't mind the idea of hunting, somebody's gotta do it. But, sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken.

Personally, I think Hillary's nuts if she thinks she'll win. There's still too much tar left from her last stay in the white house (remember all the shady property deals?). I'm guessing she's a human shield for the DNC- somebody for the Republicans to focus their attacks on, and then graciously step aside at the last minute.

2007-04-06 05:46:32 · answer #3 · answered by Beardog 7 · 1 0

In April of 1991, Bill Clinton was just a dinky little dude from Arkansas. All anyone knew about him was that when he spoke to the prior Democratic nominating convention, he seemed totally unable to shut the hell up.

2007-04-06 05:27:40 · answer #4 · answered by open4one 7 · 2 0

he's have been given some reliable concepts, yet he promises them incredibly badly. specific, he's a Libertarian, yet considering that Libertarians run into legislated roadblocks working for something in maximum states, he runs as a Republican. My concern with him is that he does not modern his concepts by ability of commencing with the information, and working logically by way of to his conclusions, and prefers to start with a stunning end, observed by ability of information and good judgment. this does not often paintings, because of the fact the conclusions are so stunning, no one will pay any interest to the coolest judgment. for example, say it have been the year 1400, and that i pronounced "the international is around!" actually everyone could snigger, different than those that would desire to be calling for my beheading. whether, if I reported the adaptation interior the dimensions of shadows of two sticks of equivalent top spaced 1000 miles aside, measured on a similar time, and confirmed by way of prevalent geometric concepts how that indicated that the earth weren't flat, i could merely exchange somebody's techniques.

2016-11-07 09:27:51 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

All of them. Not a single current candidate is worth a vote since none of them will do anything benficial for the nation. They will all say the same things (but in different ways). Here is what we are all certain to hear from EVERY candidate:

"I will fix the war in Iraq and bring our troops home."
"I have a plan to make Soc.Sec. more solvent."
"I have a plan to make healthcare available to all people of the USA."
"I want to rid the gov't of curruption."
"My administration will do what's right for America."
"Illegal immigration has to be fixed."

And after all the blowing and huffing we will elect another idiot (because that is all we will have for choices-smart people don't run for President), who will do little or nothing towards the above promises. Oh we will get out of Iraq somehow but that won't be due entirely to the next leader.

2007-04-06 05:30:39 · answer #6 · answered by thinking-guru 4 · 4 1

Mitt has a lot of Mormon friends who have money on hand....he is a right wing type but, probably, is a good human being. I would like him to explain the Angel Maroni. That would be interesting ! This is the USA so lets give him a chance. He doesn't speak to Gold does he?

2007-04-06 05:36:37 · answer #7 · answered by cristales 5 · 0 0

I say Hilary Clinton, and any republican. Hilary should just contribute all of her fundraiser money to the democratic party. Al Gore for president, Barack Obama for vice president. America would be truly the best place to live. Everyone might have a chance to prosper then. And with both of them on the ticket I dont think any republican would even have a chance. The only republican I can ever agree with is arlen spector and sometimes Rudolph juliani

2007-04-06 05:36:33 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I think Rudy is completely out of his mind to be running. Who does he think he is? (What planet are we on again??) A couple of photo ops on rubble piles after 9/11, and now he thinks he's qualified to go from being the mayor of New York to being the 'leader' of the free world? Frightening. And the people donating money (millions) to his campaign and supporting him? Absolutely astounding. Wake up people-- this is NOT a popularity contest, and the revolution will NOT be televised! WAKE UP ALREADY, OUR FUTURE IS AT STAKE!!!!

2007-04-06 07:15:02 · answer #9 · answered by akos22 1 · 0 0

Joe Biden from Delaware -- He's run before and gotten nowhere, he's old news. He doesn't really have anything new or special to say. He has a habit of putting his foot in his mouth, and he hasn't raised enough money to even throw stones at Obama or Clinton.

2007-04-06 05:30:09 · answer #10 · answered by Barry B 2 · 2 0

Yah but Romney has a lot of support.

I think Hilary is out of ehr mind for running, even democrats don't like her, I mean Obama is doing as good as her and he has only 2 years of minor political experience!!!! lololol, they choose an unexperienced, young, minority over a careered female politician and ex first lady.

2007-04-06 05:27:08 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers