http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?vid=182620&fr=
2007-04-06 05:04:53 · 3 answers · asked by the_bestsinger 2 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
i dont think its true i just wondered
2007-04-06 05:34:16 · update #1
i like George bush
2007-04-06 08:33:42 · update #2
What typical media spin trash. Must it always be a conspiracy in the United States media?
Listen people! A jet doing 500 mph with extremely volatile jet fuel on board crashing into a tall structure such as the WTC buildings equals devestation, The initial crash and combined heat generated from the resulting fire weakened the steel structure of these buildings. Ergo the upper floors collapsed and this free falling weight created a domino effect for the bottom two thirds of the buildings. This is not rocket science.
2007-04-06 05:24:31 · answer #1 · answered by rockrib2000 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Fire didn't cause the collapse. When the planes hit the building the structural damage caused the collapse.
2007-04-06 12:23:42 · answer #2 · answered by catsmeowjrk2000 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. I don't think it's true. I think it's ridiculous. Bush could have forced a war with Iraq using much simpler lies and propaganda.
2007-04-06 15:22:51 · answer #3 · answered by jptrahar 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋