I can understand how some people have drawn conclusions that Iraq pre-war had a direct link to terrorism (I don't agree but understand). What I need help understanding is how some answers conclude that if we did not pursue the war in Iraq that we would all be living under terrorist rule. It seems a bit far-fetched to me. Is this just an over zealous reaction?
2007-04-06 04:07:19 · 2 answers · asked by CHARITY G 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
It is just part of the repuglican rhetoric, most of what is said about why we went to war has been proven to be incorrect. I do think we must remain diligent at home though. .
2007-04-09 10:00:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I support the war but I do agree with you that saying if we were never involved in the war with Iraq we would be living under terrorist rule is far-fetched. I think it is equally as far-fetched as those who say that if we just left the Muslims and the Middle East alone they would leave the US alone. That was practically our policy before 9/11.
2007-04-09 12:33:00 · answer #2 · answered by gerafalop 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋