It is Good Friday and I am at work.
I'm 'not ready to make nice' like the Dixie Chicks.
2007-04-06 03:59:15 · 43 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
@armygirl-- a turd!!! LOL
@kurt-- Thank you, sweetie. You used my previous moniker so you must follow my questions and answers here on Y!A. And you must know that it makes my day when I make liberals mad!
2007-04-06 04:29:14 · update #1
I 'd take the snicker bar wrapper over her
2007-04-06 04:04:36 · answer #1 · answered by Eye of Innocence 7 · 9⤊ 8⤋
I think that the leaders in Iran must snicker at her attempts of diplomacy. Perhaps Ms. Pelosi just does not have a good understanding of the Muslim world and the quest for power and world domination. I am especially convinced of that because she favors establishment of the "nuclear fuel bank" although a country like Iran has the capability of further enriching "nuclear fuel" to be pure enough (U235) to provide fissile material for a nuclear bomb.
On April 10, 2997, an article written by Carla Mariunucci appeared in the San Francisco Chronicle, indicating that Ms. Pelosi and Rep. Lantos are interested in making a "diplomatic trip" to Iran.
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/04/10/BAGV9P6C0S6.DTL
Pelosi, Lantos may be interested in diplomatic trip to Iran
Furthermore, the article quoted Rep Lantos as saying that he co-sponsored legislation with Ms. Pelosi which could pass as early as May that calls for making available to all countries --including Iran -- nuclear fuel for peaceful purposes under international oversight by establishing a "nuclear fuel bank".
I believe that the legislation is:
HR 6 Clean Energy Act of 2007
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=110_cong_bills&docid=f:h6ih.txt.pdf
Those who advocate the "nuclear fuel bank" consider that clean nuclear technology would be available to all countries. However, those who argue against the "nuclear fuel bank" point out that the uranium enrichment process (using centrifuges to separate isotopes as in the FEP at Natanz, Iran) can also be used to produce a more pure grade of uranium 235 which may be used in a nuclear bomb.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4416482.stm
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/09/28/opinion/edbuffett.php
http://www.goodharborreport.com/node/295
The head of the Iranian Nuclear Energy Organization, Gholam-Reza Aghazadeh, explains it thus:
The simple way is to inject 0.7% (uranium) and obtain 3.5%, right? Now, if you take this 3.5% and inject it again into the chain (of centrifuges), the result will be 20%. If you inject the 20% back into the chain, the result will be 60%. If you inject this 60%, the result will be 90%.
http://www.memritv.org/Transcript.asp?P1=1120
http://www.memritv.org/Search.asp?ACT=S6&P1=2,148&P3=4
Since Iran has uranium enrichment capabilities at its FEP (fuel enrichment plant) at Natanz, giving Iran nuclear "fuel" enriched to 3.5% might not be a good idea if Iran does have the agenda to develop a nuclear bomb.
The BBC article (listed below) describes the nuclear fuel process.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/sci_nat/05/nuclear_fuel/html/mining.stm
2007-04-11 10:28:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually, I'd prefer one of my daughter's dirty diapers over her! She is a disgrace to this FINE country. But don't you think she is acting like a a middle school girl? She didn't go to Syria for diplomacy...she went to undermine Hillary's attempt at the MERE BID for the Dem's....can you imagine Washington with 2 queens? Ugh! God help us!
2007-04-06 07:16:00 · answer #3 · answered by MaHaa 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm another one. A half eaten Snckers bar would not be out gallivanting around the middle east and rubbing up to our enemies.
2007-04-13 14:00:47 · answer #4 · answered by just the facts 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Traitorous, insubordinate, illogical... just a few of the words i would use to describe her!
I did not ask her to go to Syria and talk with the enemy "she is not doing the things she does to help or protect me"...
she is drummer than a box of hammers!
2007-04-14 02:10:31 · answer #5 · answered by no one here gets out alive 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Dear those are words are music to my ears, she doesn't give a damn about anyone but herself, I don't care how you feel about our President. As the leader of the HOR you don't visit a county with known ties with terrorist. She should be charged with treason, or atleast Sedition.
2007-04-13 17:13:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You go girl, Pissy pelosi is a traitor
2007-04-12 07:08:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Rarely have I seen someone in Public Office as much in love with herself as Nancy Pelosi. Unfortunately intelligence is not commensurate with her ego...which is out of control. She is dangerous not only for her Party, but for the people of this country.
2007-04-06 04:12:26 · answer #8 · answered by Alfie333 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
There is nothing wrong with Pelosi.
Give the women a chance. I dont see why everyone is so down on her when no one knows who she is!
2007-04-13 10:00:57 · answer #9 · answered by eddie9551 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I am with you girl! I can not stand to watch that woman, much less listen to her twisted version of reality. Thanks to that scum bag and her sheep - my husband spends another 3 months away from home.
2007-04-12 17:43:51 · answer #10 · answered by Terrie 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Luvnya2004, You are the Greatest, I wish I could marry you.
I'm just playing with you because I don't want you to think I'm crazy, but you are the greatest.
2007-04-06 04:18:19 · answer #11 · answered by Kurt 1 · 3⤊ 2⤋