English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i understand adopting like 2. max. but she has like 5 already!! whats the point of that??

2007-04-06 03:47:27 · 23 answers · asked by Anastasia 2 in Entertainment & Music Celebrities

okay, i not saying anything is wrong with it! im just wondering... i would do that too. but im wayy to young

2007-04-06 04:02:37 · update #1

23 answers

Angelina does have a baby of her own, her and Brad Pitt had one. Angelina figures why have more children when there are children out there with no mother or fathers and they need a life where they be sue that they will grow to be adults, not die at a young age. I congratulate her. She is doing her part to make this world a little bit more friendly

2007-04-06 03:56:07 · answer #1 · answered by NorthBayLady 2 · 4 2

she adopts them because she can. Both herself and Brad have expressed a wish for a large family. She became involved after making the film" Beyond Borders"> She has 3 adopted children and one biological child, the yougest, Shiloh.
Some people will say " why doesn't she adopt kids here" Reason. there are long waiting lists here, ( why i don't know). Some people wait in this country for 7 -10 years before they get the call about a possible child for them
There are still some states that only encourage same race adoption which leaves even more children out of a " forever family".
Some might say, why doesn't she do something along the lines of Oprah, she does not have that kind of money Oprah is a billionaire, while Angelina is not. She is just trying to do some good for children who most likely never have that chance.
As to adoptions that result in large families. There are many right here in this country. One that comes to mind is a family of 24, 2 of whom were the biological children, the rest were adopted.
Kudos to her for the lives she can possibly enhance

2007-04-06 04:18:37 · answer #2 · answered by thequeenreigns 7 · 1 2

some of these comments are really going to hurt adopted children if they ever read them. I'm not a fan of these two at all but there could be any amount of reasons why Angelina doesn't look happy in pictures. Giving birth is a huge event, she may not feel at her best either physically or emotionally, she may have baby blues, she may just not have got used to having given birth, I'm sure all three children are loved equally. And if not, then in years to come the adopted two will make oodles of money selling their stories of a neglected childhood to all the tabloids and magazines, a bit like Angelina has done with her public split from her own father

2016-05-18 04:22:07 · answer #3 · answered by abbie 3 · 0 0

Angelina Jolie have already adopted 4 kids and have a baby on her own with Brad Pitt named Shiloh.

She adopt the kids because as a Goodwill Ambassador for the UN Refugee Agency, she feels that she will give them a good future after she visits various Refugee camps all around the world.

2007-04-06 04:09:43 · answer #4 · answered by dragon 2 · 0 1

She does have a biological baby with Brad. I think it is wonderful that she is adopting children with less than fortunate lives. She is giving them a good life and excellent care. Why have more biological ones when there are SO many children out there that need a good home and life? I say a huge KUDOS to Angelina for giving these kids a better life. They are truely Blessed to have her as a mom.

2007-04-06 05:57:46 · answer #5 · answered by joyshine72 2 · 1 2

Um, she already had a biological baby with Brad, they named the baby girl Shiloh Nouveau Jolie-Pitt. She adopts kids because, in my opinion, she wants to help kids with undetermined futures who are less fortunate. She and Brad have adopted so many because they said they would like a big family. What's bigger than having 5 or more kids? I totally agree w/ dphlantz.

2007-04-06 03:56:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Her very public adoption of babies from impoverished nations is a combination of generousity and ego. If she really wants to help the plight of third world children maybe she should do something that follows along the lines of Oprah Winfrey's public education projects in Africa. It does a lot more good for the children who are left behind in the wake of one of these adoptions.

2007-04-06 03:57:02 · answer #7 · answered by Al G 4 · 2 1

the point is that she has a shi@ load of money and can give them more than they ever desired. Instead of growing up alone, they can become anything they want to be. Im sure if it was cheaper to adopt many more people would do it. Its like $15-25k Australian dollars to adopt a child from overseas.

2007-04-06 04:14:59 · answer #8 · answered by nicole 3 · 1 1

umm she has one of her own that she jsut gave birth to, and there is nothin wrong with adopting children from 3rd world countrys, shes taking them out of poverty and giving them a home instead of a box, what is wrong with you if you had the chance, power and the money wouldnt you want to help someone in need. Thats not all she does for 3rd world countrys either she gives and gives and gives and is always visiting and helping with her own help not sending peopel to do it for her you really are iggnorant

2007-04-06 03:58:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Because she has the means to provide for them and is making a statement to the rest of the world about orphans in underdeveloped countries that are dying waiting for help.
And she does have a child of her own in addition to the 3 she has adopted.

2007-04-06 03:54:45 · answer #10 · answered by his temptress 5 · 6 1

fedest.com, questions and answers