His statement "When physical environment changes, our view of life changes" is basically accurate. But, since Marx was a political extremist the direction he took with it, and the conclusions he made were conjecture and largely false, or overly optimisitic.
2007-04-06 03:30:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by rohak1212 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
First off you are selectively quoting Marx out of context. I also think you are incorrectly interpreting the second quote about the law of gravity.
Marx was attempting to explain to a proletariat reader that he cannot escape the reality that the bourgeoisie controls everything by simply denying it - it is a cold, hard fact. It had nothing to do with free will, in fact, Marx holds the same exact claims as Hegel does in regards to free will - it doesn't matter.
Free will is useless because in the end all that matters is alienation coming to an end and the subjective fusing with the objective in what they consider the end of the dialectic.
And by the way, Marx was not a political extremist, he was simply a Young Hegelian economic philosopher, he cared nothing for politics.
Also, the murder of millions of people in the 20th century had nothing to do with Karl Marx - that was a revolutionary taking his quotes out of context much like the asker of this question did. Also like Hitler did with Nietszche, get your facts straight mr. conservative.
2007-04-06 03:37:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by aristotle1776 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Also remember that Marx' ideas culminated in the murder of over 120 million people in the 20th century. Geez he had some great ideas.
Free will is real. Sometimes choices can remove that free will from you. The person who starts drinking alcohol for example can become a drunk and lose that free will to booze. Why start in the first place. Same with becoming a liberal.
2007-04-06 03:32:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by kent j 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
VOTE NO BAILOUT Dear Congress, Years of bad decisions and stupid mistakes have created an economic nightmare in this country, but $700 billion in new debt is not the answer. As a tax-paying American citizen, I will not support any congressperson who votes to implement such a policy. Instead, I submit the following three steps: Common Sense Plan. I. INSURANCE B. In order A. Insure the subprime bonds/mortgages with an underlying FHA-type insurance. Government-insured and backed loans would have an instant market all over the world, creating immediate and needed liquidity. For a company to accept the government-backed insurance, they must do two things: 1. Rewrite any mortgage that is more than three months delinquent to a 6% fixed-rate mortgage. a. Roll all back payments with no late fees or legal costs into the balance. This brings homeowners current and allows them a chance to keep their homes. b. Cancel all prepayment penalties to encourage refinancing or the sale of the property to pay off the bad loan. In the event of foreclosure or short sale, the borrower will not be held liable for any deficit balance. FHA does this now, and that encourages mortgage companies to go the extra mile while working with the borrower—again limiting foreclosures and ruined lives. 2. Cancel ALL golden parachutes of EXISTING and FUTURE CEOs and executive team members as long as the company holds these government-insured bonds/mortgages. This keeps underperforming executives from being paid when they don’t do their jobs. C. This backstop will cost less than $50 billion—a small fraction of the current proposal. II. MARK TO MARKET A. Remove mark to market accounting rules for two years on only subprime Tier III bonds/mortgages. This keeps companies from being forced to artificially mark down bonds/mortgages below the value of the underlying mortgages and real estate. B. This move creates patience in the market and has an immediate stabilizing effect on failing and ailing banks—and it costs the taxpayer nothing. III. CAPITAL GAINS TAX A. Remove the capital gains tax completely. Investors will flood the real estate and stock market in search of tax-free profits, creating tremendous—and immediate—liquidity in the markets. Again, this costs the taxpayer nothing. B. This move will be seen as a lightning rod politically because many will say it is helping the rich. The truth is the rich will benefit, but it will be their money that stimulates the economy. This will enable all Americans to have more stable jobs and retirement investments that go up instead of down. This is not a time for envy, and it’s not a time for politics. It’s time for all of us, as Americans, to stand up, speak out, and fix this mess.
2016-05-18 04:17:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
With almost every philosophy, there are shreds of truth you can pick and choose. With almost every leader, there is good. One shouldn't take a philosophy like communism that has proven over time not to work and say it is a great philosophy because these few things in it are true.
Remember, Hitler gave the German people confidence. Mussolini made the trains run on time. Stalin led the Soviets to victory over the Nazis. I still wouldn't want to live in a country run by either of those men just because they accomplished those things.
Just as I won't follow those men, I won't follow the philosophy of a man who espouses Communism, which hasn't shown any signs of success yet. Again, just because there are some truths in what Marx wrote, doesn't mean everything is true. Charles Manson told his girls just enough truths to get them to follow him. He was eventually able to turn them into killers.
2007-04-06 03:51:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Kevin C 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Buddhist's believe in "accepting what is"
and reacting to it positively. No need to
wine, ask why me or any of that crap.
No need to yell, " Despite all my rage
I am still just a rat in a cage". We just
accept that all are born to experience
a certain amount of suffering. We enjoy
the goodtimes and allow yourself to
grow and learn as a result of the bad
ones. That is all.
2007-04-06 04:25:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Standing Stone 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If your going to quote someone, you should spell his/her name correctly.
Its Karl MARX.
2007-04-06 03:28:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Here's a door: When?
Good luck!
2007-04-06 03:53:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Alex 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
as popeye said it. i yam what i yam
2007-04-06 04:26:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by henryredwons 4
·
0⤊
0⤋