the war of the worlds or time machine? which ones more easy? interesting? shorter? more likely to get me an A?

Answer 1

It is not the book you choose, but rather the way you do your work related to the reading of it. Short & Easy is a bad habit to get into.

War of the Worlds was great, but I like the story of the Orson Welles broadcast, reading it aloud, and the ensuing panic.

Answer 2

For the U. S. to apply first strike, a McCain Palin value ticket would pick to occupy the administration. So if extreme means and diplomatic efforts look below a triumphing govt branch combination in 4 years, the risk will boost with the help in inventive and prescient of the applicants. Out interior the international, i do no longer see aggression for turf outdoors of Afghanistan Pakistan, yet there's a actual threat nuclear will finally be utilized with the help of somebody. If classic militia skill fail and governments fail interior the area, that's plenty extra volatile for them.

Answer 3

They are both interesting stories. If you like science fiction you will enjoy them both. Personally, I like The Time Machine more because of its treatment of post apocalyptic civilizations. Anyway, a good analysis of either will get you an A.

Answer 4

Both are interesting.

TIme Machine is short, but you have to expect that from a book that skips 600,000 years.

As far as A material, you only get an A, if you put A work into it. I would choose whichever book captures your attention and keeps it longer.

Answer 5

Time Machine is the best

Answer 6

Time Machine might be a little easier to write a paper about... the metaphors are a little more obvious.

Answer 7

they are both fairly interesting and short. the time machine is easier to write about. to get an "A" you will have to put the effort into your work.

Answer 8

Time Machine is better.

Answer 9

read them both and make your own choice.