I got as far as "LIER..." in your question and I thought that somebody who can't even spell such a simple word would probably come out with a load of rubbish - and I was right ! ! !
2007-04-07 04:09:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Richard E 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
I saw the second plane hit with the half a plane sticking out the other tower. I heard the Architect and Engineer of record describe the reason for failure. Being an engineer, I understood them and their analysis was sound. Is your degree in engineering or conspiracies?
If you want to investigate something that doesn't look right try the pentagon attack. I found it odd that the pictures taken within an hour of the attack didn't show a 2 story high hole in the building. Also, the damage penetrated about 75 feet into the structure (the plane was over 150 feet long) but there was no aircraft parts or pieces visible.
FYI: I think the man is a liar and a propagandist too.
2007-04-06 02:20:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Alan S 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
I have said this before Mr. Bush was not behind the 9/11 attacks there is no way that a US president would dare to plan an attack on his people.
I may not like Mr. Bush (nor am I American I am British) but common sense tells you that Mr. Bush would never have the audacity to plan an attack on likes of 9/11 don't believe the conspiracy its all balderdash.
I mean in 2001 a new government was elected into power and Mr. Bush was elected President of the United States of America Mr. Bush had only been in power for seven months before the attacks took place an attack like 9/11 would have taken years to plan and you would have to recruit the right people and then train them there is noway you could plan all that in seven months.
I think you need to start watching the real news not programmes about conspiracy theories its all balderdash and lies and cover ups.
Like I said I do not like Mr. Bush nor do I care for his polcies but even I know that a President of the United States would never dare attack his own people Mr. Bush is not insane.
He might come accross as ignorant and arrogant he is not dictator nor is he a mass murderer. The American people would not allow it.
2007-04-06 02:08:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Are you suggesting that there is high quality progression in some way or as assumed by ability of many respondents right here, recommend a derogatory unfavourable progression..? yet i could desire to work out it actually in basic terms.. all your hates of your President are stupid.. the two in his international adventures or kin regulations like abortion.. Who in this international is working incredibly for the reliable of all humanity.. without an awl to grind for his u . s . a ... so he may be eyeing for the gasoline wealth of the moguls in all patriotism.. which chief of a rustic would desire to mirror the desire of all his human beings in actually everyone of his movements / regulations..? if he had prevalent abortion as a coverage the full communities of pious individuals and the humanists could have cursed him for killing existence a criminal offense of nature..! He had no longer completed greater beneficial errors than the great stalwarts of history have already completed in abundance.. there is physically powerful and undesirable consequence to each action and one would desire to enable the guy elected to do what he thinks superb.. you had deserved him once you had elected him in spite of each and every thing.. the bombing of eastern cities had created no longer in basic terms dying and suffering however the top of a grimy conflict and an awakening that would desire to would not greater win a conflict yet instruct suicidal besides.. for this reason there is plenty stress against any possibillity of atomic conflict.. Mr Bush is giving effectual classes to the voters whilst history gave us classes.. you will desire to make certain the destiny direction and in the experience that your intentions are developed sufficient you will get a reliable successor or get extra classes from yet another like of the present incumbent,,
2016-11-07 09:09:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
A liar is someone who lies in the sense that they aren't telling the truth.
A lier is someone who lies in the sense that they lie waiting, ready to attack! ...or lie down, on the ground.
I've never met the man, but it's likely he's both. Jeff Bush too...and that Rick Cheney and Ronald Rumsfield.
2007-04-06 02:00:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by __ 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
In any case, we shouldnt be caring about this, for there are not supposed to be any tall towers in the first place, that too in America, and they should probably demolish the Empire State Building, Sears Towers, SOL, Petronas, Burj Al Arab, Eiffel Tower, etc. for these could hinder the development of an airborne transport system so we could drive vehicles in-air - PH
2007-04-06 01:56:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
There's just one tiny problem with this theory - the Bush family is really really rich. $60 million is just about chicken feed.
2007-04-10 00:27:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by sdc_99 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Boy Howdy................... that's a real Texas size line of BS. Whatever it is you are smoking/ingesting, it shur do put you off in LALA LAND. Never wanna touch that stuff myself......... fer shur !!! WOOOOOOEEEEE !!!!
2007-04-06 06:34:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by richard k 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
your a warped individual i dont agree with bush well in just about anything and would not dream of backing him up but thats the biggest lot of crap av ever heard!
2007-04-06 01:53:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by jackmeeko 2
·
3⤊
3⤋
http://www.voltairenet.org/article139571.html#article139571
2007-04-06 01:51:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋