I supported the IDEA of diplomacy by which Pelosi did, but Rice was the one that should have opened the dialogue with Syria. This administration has taken the wrong course by not talking, even with enemies. How can we better understand one another's ideas or policies if we don't communicate face-to-face? The Brits are giving her credit for her diplomatic efforts with Assad as a plus for their release because Assad then persuaded Ahmadinejad to let them go. It was to prove the benefits of talks, enemies or not. But, again, it was the Bush administration's responsibility to open dialogue, not Pelosi's.
2007-04-05 22:41:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by gone 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
Bless her heart. The poor difficulty is mentally retarded. FOX information receives more advantageous rankings than all different media shops blended. it really is only a "small" mistake to accuse the CIA of mendacity to lawmakers for all time. FOX information ought to easily settle for this fact as fact like various different sheep and in no way question princess Pelosi. How dare they tell the full tale!!! How dare they educate persons!!!
2016-12-03 09:24:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by mayze 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Excuse me...support for Pelosi is the same as support for our troops? Hell she doesn't support our troops. She refused to pass a bill to fund the troops in the field. She lies to Syria about Israel's foreign Policy (which btw is definately not her job Isreal didn't make her speaker of their Parliment). She sends a Bill to the hill that is filled with pork and calls for troop withdrawal which the President said he definately will veto, then she authorizes Congress to go on "Spring Break" so that no negotiations about the Bill are possible. And when the President shows some passion about not allowing the Bill to pass she says "Calm Down". Our brave men and women deserve our respect and support and Nancy Pelosi deserves a boot in the rear.
2007-04-05 23:01:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by jeff_loves_life 3
·
5⤊
2⤋
Because Bush and Fox news are right. And as far as supporting the troops that is the last thing that embarrassment Pelosi does. She doesn't give a damn about our troops, just her own self indulgence.
2007-04-05 22:42:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by ProudAmerican 4
·
9⤊
1⤋
Did FOX News report on the Republican congressmen who also visited Syria? After all Fox is "fair and balanced."
2007-04-06 01:13:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Pelosi needs to be Impeached for failing to uphold the constitution, foreign affairs are reserved for the Executive branch solely!
What ever happen to the 6 in '06 anyway!
She has allowed the power to go to her head...
2007-04-05 22:47:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
1⤋
Have you ever seen anyone with a bigger "I'm finally somebody" grin on their face than Pelosi? Any American with an education above the 3rd grade would find her ideas impossible to support.
2007-04-05 23:09:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Maybe because Pelosi is a political animal bypassing our foreign policy practices and causing confusion by her partisan games. She represents the ultimate in partisan politics and seems only surface level in "real" reasoning.
2007-04-05 23:20:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by John C 1
·
3⤊
1⤋
Pelosi, decided she wasn't an American when she agreed to go around the State Department. She did show politicians how to get a boat load of money that way though.
2007-04-05 22:40:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
2⤋
no, it does not work both ways.
You cannot, in all conscience, support someone who is systematicaly sabotaging her country's war effort for pure political gain.
After all, Pelosi is not stupid- she must know what the effects of her actions are.
2007-04-05 22:41:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by cp_scipiom 7
·
9⤊
1⤋