English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

That Sanjay Jagdale is laying to keep safe his job? Because Chapell is Australian, so do not care about Chapell, just support Indian Cricketer to keep his job safe.
Why Chapell blamed if our student did not wrote a single word on answer sheet?
Do you think Indian Team need a new faces for 2011 WC?

2007-04-05 22:08:24 · 7 answers · asked by S_S 2 in Sports Cricket

That Sanjay Jagdale is cheating to keep safe his job? Because Chapell is Australian, so do not care about Chapell, just support Indian Cricketer to keep his job safe.
Why Chapell blamed if our student did not wrote a single word on answer sheet?
Do you think Indian Team need a new faces for 2011 WC?

2007-04-05 22:11:45 · update #1

7 answers

Yes some where you are right.

Because Indian cheat always and corrupt. they can cheat for their personal benefits. not like other citizen to yes or no.

Chapell is a person with self respect. e. g Sachin is a Indian hero. he might do care about Chapell. and Sourav and Sehwag was a over confident. so they also do not care about Chapell.

No one can send out any one a single player from this team.

So Indian do not have guts to make any decision.

Yes Team India need new faces for next WC.

You Mr Yeshpal Sharma told, we india lost match against sri lanka, sachin must go out now he used very strong words.
e.g he told that sachin donot leave him self then we have to say him good bye , no more sachin if we need good game.

But just two days ago when he heard that sachin is not leaving cricket, now he told that he must play test matches. now he changed his words against sachin.

So India is a country of full of darkness.

No one speak truth in India like Chapell.

2007-04-05 22:27:02 · answer #1 · answered by C B S 4 · 2 1

As far as I know from media reports, Jagdale's report on Team India's performance in WC 2007 is roughly similar to that of Chappell's - both have questioned the attitude of the senior players. So, no question of Jagdale blaming Chappell as you say. They might both be lying (its not 'laying' by the way) for all you know, just to save their skins by putting the blame of defeat on the senior cricketers. Jagdale is known to be no less crafty than Chappell.
The duty of our cricketers is to play well and that of a coach to guide them to play well. Chappell's chop and change and abrupt rotation of batting order tactics in the name of experimentation have cost the team dearly as it lost its cohesiveness. Many players now allege that they were scared stiff of Chappell, who would threaten to drop them if they failed to follow his line. That kind of thing hardly inspires confidence in a team. Players are on tenterhooks as to whether they would be included in or dropped from the team in the next day's match. Can such mental stress bring about the best in any player, especially a new comer? Of course the team played far below its potential and must take the lion's share of the blame. But Chappell must take his share too.
By 2011, many of the present faces would retire simply because of their advanced age. We need to look much closer than that. Some non performers need to be axed immediately from Team India in its upcoming engagements after the end of World Cup 2007.

2007-04-06 13:22:19 · answer #2 · answered by Modest 6 · 0 0

fav lineup should be openers ganguly & tendulkar then dravid yuvraj kartik dhoni pathan kumble srisanth zahir and anybody for captain's wish according to situation. batsmen or bowler
if a ship sinks caption and navigator are equally responsible.
we think or not there would be new team in 2011. a leader is who can take max output from team. if not he is responsible for everything. if both were not satisfied from team selection at starting then they had resigned at that time. this is loyalty and committment for the game and fans.

2007-04-06 07:11:02 · answer #3 · answered by akash anand 2 · 0 0

2011 seems far away. I do not think new or old is the answer. Just see Bangladesh Tamim's (17) batting, see Jaisurya's (38) batting, Hayden's batting (37), Mortaza's (21) bowling; It is not age, but a combination of many factors that count.

Let us not give emotional support, but rational support.

2007-04-06 06:20:20 · answer #4 · answered by ha ha 2 · 0 0

I fully agree with you. It seems that he is partisan in his report and want to keep the senior players appeased.

2007-04-06 17:40:03 · answer #5 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0 0

agree with last line

2007-04-06 06:02:51 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0 1

agree

2007-04-06 07:46:03 · answer #7 · answered by john 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers