2007-04-05 21:33:05 · 22 answers · asked by setexamplez 1 in Social Science ➔ Psychology
Lucky! cause s/he wouldn't get away with that stink any other way (i.e. if broke)
2007-04-13 21:36:46 · answer #1 · answered by Angel 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think the money has anything to do with it. No morals? Well...everyone has to make their own choices. The horrible attitude would have me calling this person miserable and maybe a jerk.
2007-04-06 04:43:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would call that person POOR.
Why? Because when all is said and done, it doesn't matter how much money you have. If you're not happy and you don't know how to treat others, then it just really doesn't matter how wealthy you are in the "material sense", because you are socially and morally bankrupt.
2007-04-06 04:48:49 · answer #3 · answered by JOURNEY 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Donald Trump
2007-04-06 04:37:43 · answer #4 · answered by Ashlee 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Paris Hilton?
2007-04-11 20:20:45 · answer #5 · answered by Trish G 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton
ALL politicians
lawyer
Al Sharpton
Don Imus
2007-04-13 16:29:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lost
2007-04-06 04:52:13 · answer #7 · answered by BIGDAWG 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
S/he sounds troubled. No morals might mean a sociopath or psychopath, if that's truly the case. Money is immaterial to it.
2007-04-06 04:47:19 · answer #8 · answered by Katherine W 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rosie O'Donnell
2007-04-13 21:37:38 · answer #9 · answered by baglady 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A jerk, prick, or simply insecure. Oh, and money has nothing to do with it ... I know "poor" people with bad attitudes and a lack of morals.
2007-04-12 20:28:56 · answer #10 · answered by 85penguins 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would call them stuok up constded self center an going nowwhere in life but down hill they will always have hard time in life
2007-04-06 04:43:25 · answer #11 · answered by lea 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋