The genocide contract signed in the United Nations at the date of 9.12.1948, went into effect at the date of 12.01.1951 in accordance with 13. section of this law.
Armenian genocide has not been accepted in that time, therefore, Armenians have no right to want anything like land or indemnity from Turkish side. i dont know why the sounds have increased for the name of the Armenian genocide in recent years. Where were these people many years ago? Maybe, they want to create a political pressure against Turks and cause Turkiye to open their borders to Armenians and break the embargo of Turkiye on Armenia... However, we will never open our boundaries to them, as they dont apologize from us because of their lies!
---
Even Turkish archieves are open (Armenians dont open their archieves!), many people believe in the genocide so that in their country, Armenians talk about a so-called genocide so much and for all over the years, Turks have not taken these claims seriously.
Why those countries accept this nonsense thing by their courts or laws and dont let historians talk about it?
However, if someone talks too much, that doesnt mean s/he tells the truth. Everybody has to be unprejudiced and make their comments after they read the history from every source.
And if someone claims the genocide, they have to prove it first, not the others have to prove there is no genocide.
---
Armenia continues to make propaganda against Turkiye, says that there are lots of proofs, documents etc. but do not accept establishing an international committee which can finally come out with certain results. If they are so sure, why to hide then ?
The claimed genocide was in a time of a civil war that Armenians, Azeris, Turks and Kurds involved. Turkey accepts that thousands of Armenians was killed by Turkish gangs, militas but thousands of Azeris, Kurds and Turks were killed by Armenians also in the same period. So it is not so easy to name it as a genocide.
It is same every where, my friend. The actual history and national history that tought in schools,family etc. is different in every country. If you think there is an Armenian genocide, may be it is time for you to check other side of the story. For instance, you may start with the Azeris killed by Armenians.
The claimed armenian genocide was almost a century ago. The claimed first Azeri genocide was almost a century ago, and then again and then again. Today there are still thousands of refugees because of the conflict between Azerbaycan and Armenia. Why don't they focus on your existing problem first because of which thousands of families is still suffering ????
That wikipedia and the other armenian web sites are one-sided and the thing there are not real.
http://www.turkisharmenians.faithweb.com/
is a web page, which was made by Armenians. Please visit it.
---
year: 1920s; there is nothing, but peace and agreements between turkiye and armenia and on their boundaries
year: 1950s; armenian racists claim = 300 thousands
year: 1980s; armenian racists claim = 1 million
year: 2000s; armenian racists claim = 1,5 million
so in 2050, what will these increments be? 5 million?
inside the whole ottoman boundaries, there were not even 1 million armenians. so how can they claim that 1.5 million armenians died in the east anatolia?
yes, many armenians died but not because of the genocide, they died because of the war, diseases and the cold like turkish people.
with russian incitements and commitments, some armenians burned turkish villages and those people's reaction was the same.
---
An investigation of Justin McCarthy (a professor of history at the University of Louisville) will help you:
"The plan of the Armenian Nationalists has not changed in more than 100 years. It is to create an Armenia in Eastern Anatolia and the Southern Caucasus, regardless of the wishes of the people who live there. The Armenian Nationalists have made their plan quite clear. First, the Turkish Republic is to state that there was an "Armenian Genocide" and to apologize for it. Second, the Turks are to pay reparations. Third, an Armenian state is to be created.
If the Armenians were to be given what they claim, and if every Armenian in the world were to come to Eastern Anatolia, their numbers would still be only half of the number of those Turkish citizens who live there now. Of course, the Armenians of California, Massachusetts, and France would never come in great numbers to Eastern Anatolia. The population of the new "Armenia" would be less than one-fourth Armenian at best. Could such a state long exist? Yes, it could exist, but only if the Turks were expelled. That was the policy of the Armenian Nationalists in 1915. It would be their policy tomorrow.
We should be very clear on Armenian claims. Their claims are not based on history, because Armenians have not ruled in Eastern Anatolia for more than 900 years. Their claims are not based on culture: Before the revolutionaries and the Russians destroyed all peace, the Armenians and Turks shared the same culture. Armenians were integrated into the Ottoman system, and most of the Armenians spoke Turkish. They ate the same food as the Turks, shared the same music, and lived in the same sorts of houses. The Armenian claims are surely not based on a belief in democracy: Armenians have not been a majority in Eastern Anatolia for centuries, and they would be a small minority there now. Their claims are based on their nationalist ideology. That ideology is unchanging. It was the same in 1895 and 1915 as it is in 2005. They believe there should be an "Armenia" in Eastern Turkey-no matter the history, no matter the rights of the people who live there.
History teaches that the Armenian Nationalists will not stop their claims if the Turks forget the truth and say there was an Armenian Genocide. They will not cease to claim Erzurum and Van because the Turks have apologized for a crime they did not commit. No. They will increase their efforts. They will say, "The Turks have admitted they did it. Now they must pay for their crimes." The same critics who now say the Turks should admit genocide will say the Turks should pay reparations. Then they will demand the Turks give Erzurum and Van and Elazig and Sivas and Bitlis and Trabzon to Armenia.
I know the Turks will not give in to this pressure. The Turks will not submit, because they know that to do so would simply be wrong. How can it be right to become a member of an organization that demands you lie as the price of admission? Would any honest man join an organization that said, "You can only join us if you first falsely say that your father was a murderer?"
I hope and trust that the European Union will reject the demands of the Armenian Nationalists. I hope they will realize that the Armenian Nationalists are not concerned with what is best for Europe. But whatever the European Union demands, I have faith in the honor of the Turks. What I know of the Turks tells me that they will never falsely say there was an Armenian Genocide. I have faith in the honesty of the Turks. I know that the Turks will resist demands to confess to a crime they did not commit, no matter the price of honesty. I have faith in the integrity of the Turks. I know that the Turks will not lie about this history. I know that the Turks will never say their fathers were murderers. I have that faith in the Turks. "
---
FINALLY, IF WE DEFINE WAR LOSTS AS THE GENOCIDE, THEN WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE THAT WHOSE GENOCIDE THAT WAS; THESE EVENTS WERE STARTED BY ARMENIAN KILLERS. MUCH MORE TURKS HAVE BEEN KILLED BY THEM!
2007-04-08 02:57:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by ErAs 4
·
10⤊
7⤋
Hey,why don't you share documents with Turkey.We can all learn the truth.But you don't want to do it,so it's your problem.We will never say sorry for something that never happened.And not only Armenian people died,but many ppl of many countries died.İt's all over now.Why can't you be friends,...........And if you are searching for a criminal here it should be you.You don't feel anything about the diplomats killed by Armenians?This was not in the past.,tell me,who are the criminals ?
2007-04-09 08:12:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by . 3
·
3⤊
4⤋
Have you ever talked with Armenians living in Istanbul ?
Have you asked this question to the 100 000 illegal armenian immigrants who are working in Turkey to earn their living ?
Why are always provocking us with political propaganda ?
You think you are angels ?
Why did you want to help the russian army to attack us on east side ?
Why do you count the armenians who left the country as if they were killed ?
Yes, Armenians have been killed, but you also killed and raped thousands and thousands of innocent Turkish people ( even children and old people !)
It was a war, not a genocide.
And do you think the native american indian genocide was nothing compared to 1915 events ? Indians have lost 100 millions people killed by english, spanish, french, portuguese people...
Do you think that the african black genocide was nothing compared to 1915 events ? The european states and USA have raped and killed more than 100 millions Black people, during the slave period...
Do you think Indians and Africans lives are worthless ?
OPEN YOUR ARCHIVES...
When someone is complaining about something, it doesn't always mean he is right...
You just make me sick...
2007-04-08 01:16:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
10⤊
6⤋
I could tell by your name you already know the answer. If you want to show your outrage towards the Turks for what they did to your people, don't beat around the Bush.
2007-04-05 19:48:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
Turkey is already in the civil world.
And why doesn't Armenia accept the offer of Turkey to share documents?
2007-04-09 04:58:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Earthling 7
·
6⤊
5⤋
Because we can't accept a unreal thing..It wans't a genocide, it was a war.Armenians killed lots of Turkish people too but Europe prefers to recognize the Armenian people who were killed..
2007-04-08 00:20:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Irmak 7
·
9⤊
6⤋
I think the armenian genocide is one of the many reasons why Turkey is not ready to join the EU, and also the little problem with human rights violations.
2007-04-05 19:53:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by Bronk 2
·
8⤊
7⤋
I must congratulate you (and those western politicians for seemingly agreeing with you for your votes) for deceiving so many naive countries into believing what you already know is not true.
I am getting sick and tired of answering prejudiced, biased, toughheaded Armenians! I will not try to explain to you the truth, what really happened. Because, you will not listen, nor believe in it. Go ahead and live with your lies and hatred. But do not forget that hatred invites hatred. Enmity, invites more enmity.
Give me your ear, so I will listen to you too. Give me your hand, so we can walk together.
Peace at home, peace in the world (Atatürk).
I will add: Peace in your heart, peace in your life.
He who lives by the sword, shall die by the sword.
Comprendre??
2007-04-08 05:15:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by anlarm 5
·
7⤊
6⤋
Hi,
So-called Armenian Genocide is an absolutely lie.
I will explain, what happened on April, 24 1915.
The Ottoman government, against numerous rebellions that began after 1890 and promptly following Armenian massacres which resulted in the murder of tens of thousands of Turks, contented with informing most important persons of Armenian congregation and Armenian deputies that "Government will take the necessary precautions if Armenians continue to stab in the back and assassinate the Turks". However, it became a necessity to secure behind the borders because the army was in war at various fronts, the events did not stop but increased and assaults towards defenseless Turkish women and children increased.
With this aim, on April 24, 1915 the Armenian Committees were closed and 2345 of their directors were arrested due to the crime of carrying out activities against the government. April 24, which is commemorated annually as the "Anniversary of Armenian Massacre" by the Armenians abroad is this date when the 2345 revolutionary committee members were arrested and it has no relation with deportation.
I also recomended that sites,
http://www.ermenisorunu.gen.tr/english/intro/index.html
http://www.tallarmeniantale.com/
TURKISH DIPLOMATS KILLED BY THE ARMENIAN TERRORISTS DURING THEIR DUTY
The main targets of Armenian terror organizations, ASALA in particular, were now being chosen from among Turkish diplomats abroad. The first of the series of terrorist attacks was carried out against Mehmet Baydar, the Turkish Consul General in Los Angeles and his Deputy, Bahadir Demir.
The assassinations were perpetrated by an Armenian by the name of Gurgen Yanikan in 1973.
This individual action turned into organized Armenian terror as of 1975 and further escalated as of 1979. 110 acts of terror were carried out by Armenian terrorists in 38 cities of 21 countries. 39 of these were armed attacks, 70 of them bomb attacks and one was an occupation. 42 Turkish diplomats and 4 foreign nationals were assassinated in these attacks, while 15 Turks and 66 foreign nationals were wounded.
Regards
2007-04-07 06:46:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by Tanju 7
·
8⤊
9⤋
"A lie travels round the world while Truth is putting on her boots"
"Certainly, Armenians got killed as a result of massacres... often by their Muslim neighbors, in reprisal for the murderous acts committed by the Armenians (when they sided with the Russian enemy in hopes of carving out their own independence); but anybody who calls acts of massacres a "genocide" doesn't know the meaning of the word."
2007-04-05 21:38:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by mbc580 3
·
11⤊
6⤋
April 24 is coming up, one way to voice your outrage!
2007-04-05 19:53:05
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋