911 was an inside job "false flag" operation. To prove it all you need to do is come up the passenger manifest that will give you the names and addresses of all the people who were on the planes. I've seen the one from flight 93...but it only gives you the person's first and last name and all the names are quite vague. You can tell they are a bunch of phoney names just by looking at it.
2007-04-05 18:09:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ugly Betty 3
·
1⤊
6⤋
this was not a controlled demolition. You can just place explosives on beams to get controlled demolition anyway. In a contolled demolition, each floor is gutted, beams pre-cut and explosives placed. Dont seem to find evidence that the floor of the WTC or any building had been gutted prior to the planes impacting the structures.
For more info on demolition, demolition contractor services, expert demolition consulting, etc. go to Dallas Contracting Co., Inc. website
2007-04-06 07:58:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
With each of the payoffs and killings that's going to require to make the homes look like a terrorist attack, it will be a ways a lot less confusing for some those who truthfully hate us to pull off those attacks. No payoffs required to keep "those interior the comprehend" silent. it extremely is what truthfully befell to that end. Why you would somewhat have self assurance the president did this over those who've attacked us earlier and brazenly hate us is previous me.
2016-10-17 23:28:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Okay when they make steel out Iron they heat it, mix it with carbon and quick cool it, causing the carbon atoms to fill any fissures within the Iron making it harder and stronger. When steel gets to 650 degrees (farenheit not celsius) it loses most of its strength. For the last ****** time, there is no 9-11 conspiracy. There was no thermite. I would not trust some jackoff on the street about the thrust signature of a cruise missle. I made the 9-11 conspiracy up from nothing and rosie odonnel is a fat idiot.
2007-04-05 17:57:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Theodore Sebastian 3
·
4⤊
2⤋
Normally I'd just assume you were another shill on the hitcounter payroll pumping up website traffic on the graves of the murdered...but honestly...you should just stick to cut & pasting all that outdated info like the rest of your co-workers. Imbellishing with your own fantasy stuff is....well...it's just plain embarassing!
EDIT: Oops...never mind. Looks like my first hunch was right. Isn't it interesting how right after all the opposing answers get a "thumbs down" a supportive answer pops up? And when the supporitve answer from a known multiple-ID-holding spammer gets a "thumbs up," SURPRISE! Another supportive answer from a different ID just happens to appear at the same time!
Talk about an INSIDE JOB.
Tick Tock...this answer will be deleted in three...two...one..
2007-04-05 17:59:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by u_bin_called 7
·
5⤊
3⤋
Controlled demolition.
2007-04-05 18:39:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Frank 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Actually it fell in approx 15 seconds. The news was made aware that it might collapse due to the fire. The fire fighters evacuated the bldg before it collapsed as they could not contain the fire.
Here's your sign...
2007-04-05 17:52:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Chi Guy 5
·
5⤊
3⤋
Rosie says fire doesn't melt steel. Well then how is steel formed. There was a raging fire caused by jet fuel. Come on, get some common sense.
2007-04-05 17:57:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by TE 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
I think one of the bricks hit Rosie on the head.
As Charlie Brown would say, "good grief".
2007-04-05 17:57:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by TRAF 4
·
3⤊
2⤋
Good grief!!! not this conspiracy crap again!!! look go check out the popular mechanics article. If that doesn't cure you go see a shrink. Delusions ar not healthy!!
2007-04-05 17:57:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Grant E 2
·
3⤊
2⤋