will gain even more power to take over not just the Presidency but the entire US Govt. for the next 25 years or more.
Is political suicide your goal? Is your blind faith in Bush so great that you are going to not only go down with his ship but bring the entire GOP with you? Do you want another 60 year reign of Dems dominating US Govt like they did with the start of FDR only this time it's going to start with Hilary?
Do you see the freight train that is about to run you over at 100 mph or are you as clueless about Iraq as you are about the Dems?
2007-04-05 16:07:36 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Eisenhower?
Nixon?
Ford?
Reagan?
Bush 1?
Bush 2?
In 2008, Republican's will have been in the White House for 36 of your 60 year reign.
Exactly how do you define dominance?
2007-04-05 16:20:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Paul in spite of the actuality that we don't agree on many themes, maximum cases I do have self assurance you're particularly undemanding on your positions. it is incredibly not a type of cases. The intelligence is comparable to what replaced into noted by ability of many earlier Mr. Bush replaced into President consisting of invoice Clinton, John Kerry, Harry Reid and others. the story did no longer exchange for Democrats till Mr. Bush took workplace and that they have spent the final 6 years attempting to rewrite that history. the subject is that their statements are a count of public record. I settle for that folk have a suited to their evaluations or perhaps to alter their minds, yet this opposition is and continually has been cheating on the intelligence subject. extra it is a disservice to all thinking human beings to modern the theory that the full u . s . a . government and the United international locations have been hoodwinked in this count while their very own statements instruct otherwise.
2016-11-07 08:27:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually you are false. The "Libs" had their chance in the 60's and it was found that their policies just would not work which created the conservative part before 1971ish. The "Libs" were in control briefly until the "Libs" realized that there is not way it's going to work out turning "libs" into "NeoCons". So if the Libs do become the dominate party in 2008 it won't last long. Those politics will quickly change.
Look at it like a punk band... At first they are depressed and angry, but once that money starts flowing how can they stay depressed?
2007-04-05 16:15:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
The Iraq War was unpopular during Bush's last election, he was still amassing billions of dollars of debt, and the Democrats STILL couldn't put up a candidate that could beat him. How pathetic must John Kerry think he is that he couldn't beat that guy?
Maybe the Dems will win in 2008 and maybe not. Time will tell. Let me give you some advice, though. If they do, it won't be Hillary. Her negatives are WAY too high (50%?). Better find someone else.
2007-04-05 16:17:05 · answer #4 · answered by Pythagoras 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No, they think the Republicans will win the '08 Presidential election. They don't see the mistakes Bush makes over and over, they prefer to spread the lies about people like Speaker Pelosi, that they are told by their conservative talking heads.
2007-04-05 16:16:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
they think that all of America still supports them...
all polls are "liberal bias"
the elections were just a "little slip" that means nothing
in other words... they just think "as long as we stand with Bush, everything will be perfect. And anything that says otherwise is a lie".... and they believe this for no real reason, as far as I can see...
2007-04-05 16:15:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Isn't it great? We will all sing happy days are here again. The nation will move forward instead of backward.
2007-04-05 16:14:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
As a lib I say it will be great. And, thanks for the 2 points that I made off with. BTW, the freight train hit, it's name was GWB.
2007-04-05 16:23:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
You've been reading too many poles. The war on terror has a lot more support in this country than you are led to believe. There is a solid core in the voting block who realize the consequences of losing this war - reference Spain and France, and their troubles have just begun.
2007-04-05 16:16:07 · answer #9 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
bush pretty much has the new world order in effect. but most people still willingly give up their rights to him. one more terrorist attack in the u.s. and bush will declare martial law. and the end of our freedom.
2007-04-05 16:18:03 · answer #10 · answered by Mr. Wolf 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋