I definately think she needs to be removed as Speaker of the House. You may recall that Trent Lott stated that Strom Thurmond was a part of American History and the buttplug libs made so much noise that he had to step down as majority Leader in the Senate, but this woman LIED and MISREPRESENTED herself to a TERRORIST STATE for no other reason than her outright anti-American hatred for our President. Her IQ is lower than room temperature and she should be FORCED out of the Speaker position.
2007-04-05 15:19:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
12⤋
In the 70s someone had the idea to talk with communist and pact with them an alliance. Henry Kissinger, he talked with the China of Mao and made an improbable alliance. The result was simple, USA could pull out their troops from Vietnam, USA lose the war but won the peace, the aconomic alliance with China, and the final victory over the soviet bloc. Diplomacy just diplomacy. Obviously USA doesnt have such talent anymore. The pragmatism died in USA, the day that the pragmatism died in USA was the begining of the end of the American empire. With the kind of thinking of this fool idealistic minds (well blind fanatics) the only thing is fight and fight decades as israel as did it. USA is part of the middle east because of you fanatics and USA can't fight 50 years. The middle east people can fight centuries without problem (persians, arabs jews). they have the patience of the eternity just see the jews, they waited almost 2000 years their land. USA only have 200. What the hell're you thinking? spend other 200 there? the middle east people could laugh of the 200 years of the USA just kids, jews 5000 years old at least, persians 3000 years old, arabs 2000 years old, islam 1500 years old. USA just 200. the patience of milleniums against jajaja a country that want in win a war in weeks. Do you know why the jews, arabs and persians give their lives? because the fight to get the victory in 500 or 1000 years, thay fight for the future, US fight for the security of themselfs (this generation), the others are fighting for their grandchildren
2007-04-06 04:40:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by maravilla 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I guess she thinks she is the same kind of person that the Republican representative that went with her is. Funny how Pelosi is all over the news, especially Fox News, they haven't reported anything significant since Anna Nicole died, yet no one talks about him. BTW, maybe she was there to explain the US's stance on terrorist states and those that support them. Someone's got to talk to them since the President is pouting because they won't kneel before him and Condoleeza couldn't hold an intelligent conversation with a giddy 16yo girl, let alone a leader of a country.
2007-04-05 22:37:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
She probably thinks she is the Speaker of the House and as such the third most powerful person in the USA after Bush and Cheney. Oh, that's right, she IS!
As Speaker she has more of a right to run her mouth than Republican Senators like Arlen Specter, who was there just a couple days earlier talking to the Syrian government and yet, the White House isnt complaining about them, are they?
2007-04-05 22:53:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
She understands that she IS the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives. And thank God and Greyhound the elephants are gone. And no one speaks for Israel but the Israeli people. If she carried a diplomatic message FOR the Israeli people then that is considered cooperation with ones ALLIES. Or has it been so long that common sense was in the White house we must explain simple political science to you? There is a fresh new breeze blowing throughout this country brother American. "You're either part of a solution, or you're the problem".
2007-04-05 22:28:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Joe Schmo from Kokomo 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
It is very plain, that with leadership skills she possesses, combined with the kiss **** attitude some of our other enlightened Congressmen and Senators display, is the reason this country is literally going down the tube. Unfortunately ignorance is not against the law.
2007-04-05 23:09:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by scallywag 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think she's the Speaker of the House, and she can go where she pleases. I also think that Republican Representatives Wolfe and Aderholt visited Syria too and yet you don't seem too wound up about it.
I think you don't understand what impeachment is, and that you're a bigot for calling San Francisco Gay Bay. Finally, I think you should make some effort to educate yourself about world affairs instead of getting your information from Michelle Malkin and Fox News.
2007-04-05 22:20:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
4⤋
Ha ha I agree. I like how she is telling Syria to get more women in their government and is bashing Bush for the Iraq war which is aimed at giving freedom to those people where they can have women in politics. She's telling one nation to have more women politics, but hating on us for trying to let another country have that exact thing. Ohhh Pelosi. She's just a crazy lady. ha ha
2007-04-05 22:20:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by German 2
·
4⤊
3⤋
"You cannot talk with terrorist. Ask the PEANUT man. What good did all his talking do?"
No I guess you trade weapons for hostages Just ask Bonzo the chimp lover Reagan, wait he's dead ask Ollie North traitor hired by FAUX NEWS
2007-04-05 22:37:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
And what about the 3 Republican congressmen that went there 3 days before...? Dubya didn't send them... so...? What's YOUR point? You think you know so much more... why aren't YOU serving in either the Senate or House of Reps? Do you even have a GED??? Or are you too busy at your McDonald's job frying burgers and fries? It bothers you that a WOMAN has more sense than the drooling idiot in the White House and his gang of incompetent nincompoops?
2007-04-05 22:19:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
5⤋
From what I hear a number of republican where either going with her or taking their own trips in a similar time frame. Your argument has no credibility.
2007-04-05 22:42:23
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋