English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

A lot of what set the stage for WWII started with the treaty that ended WWI. Germany was forced to pay hefty reparations that crippled her economically. Making it nearly impossible for a country to succeed through peaceful means is just the sort of thing that would make people want to play nice, right? Thought it seems obvious now, it took a very long time for people to recognize this factor.

2007-04-05 11:34:48 · answer #1 · answered by pag2809 5 · 2 0

WW I and WW 2 were completely different wars. WW I Started with the assasination of Archduke Ferdinand of Austia-Hungary. WW 2 was about taking Adolf Hitler out of power. The U. S. entered the war on the side of the Allies when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, Hawaii on December 7, 1942.

2007-04-05 11:42:38 · answer #2 · answered by Pat 1 · 0 1

undeniably... the 1st and 2nd international wars have been fought between eu powers over the international as an empire. The Germans have been a clean capability competing with the British for colonies. the international wars have been 2 engagements interior the conflict of three generations of empires. The previous: Britain and France the recent: Germany (with a meaningless alliance to a death Austro-Hungarian empire), Italy and then Japan. The up and commers: the U. S. grew to become a international capability because of the fact it survived unscathed and with plenty to sell. the U.S. replaced into born out of WWI and grew to become an ability interior the inter-conflict era. surely, the upward push of Nazism would be considered as a reaction to the upward push of the Soviet Union on the area of capitalists. British incation, each and every so often misunderstood as cowardice replaced into no longer something different than an unstated alliance. different than the German knew that they had much less to learn from defeating the Russians than from defeating the previous British imperialists. there is greater beneficial than continuity, it is yet one conflict with 2 rounds. the recent empire (Germans) complicated the previous (Britain), allowing an opportunistic new capability to stand up (US). it is not that straightforward, of direction. yet once you pick a greater effective clarification, you will would desire to ask. edit: Jews had no longer something to do with the two conflict. Get that out of your heads. The Holocaust replaced into unfavourable, whether it does no longer make the Allies heroes to have by twist of fate stopped the holocaust. Allies have been imperialists struggling with to maintain their share of the international. era.

2016-11-07 07:47:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

World war one caused Germany to get into a great debt becuase they were left responsible for the damages done in world war one so then hitler began to rise up by promising thos in poverty great jobs and riches and so many germans followed hitler into his racist and prejudices and than world war two began by hitler trying to take over the world

2007-04-05 11:30:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

WWI was a smaller war, and many years later WWII started which was a huge, mass killing global struggle.

2007-04-05 11:44:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Completely different conflict. On started when we were attacked at Pear Harbor, and the other was us, and others, stepping in to get Hitler out of power.

2007-04-05 11:31:16 · answer #6 · answered by Amanda R 2 · 0 3

Completely new. WW (one) was about 1918 to 1919 and WW (two) was 1940 to 1945 or so.

2007-04-05 11:30:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

WWII was a different war from WWI

2007-04-05 11:30:10 · answer #8 · answered by ♥♥The Queen Has Spoken♥♥ 7 · 0 2

I really don't remember anything about ww1 but ww2 was about hitler and his nazi's not liking the jewish but, i belive they were totally diff

2007-04-05 11:35:37 · answer #9 · answered by ♥ilyTaylorLautner♥ 2 · 0 1

I have heard many theories,some say yes it was ,others say no. I have my own theory which simply put is that it was alittle of both.

2007-04-05 13:25:51 · answer #10 · answered by dderry216 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers