Liberal Links to Subversive Propaganda?

Question

I'm really curious-----how many of you out there take the time to click on the links liberals add to their posts? I have clicked on some of them and found either dead links that give an access denied or error message----or if it is a real link it will take you to some weirdo wacko that says all kinds of strange untruths? I seldom will click on these anymore. The reason I ask this is I have noticed a disturbing trend----liberal say wheres the proof? of if you don't provide links your post is meaningless.------has anyone else noticed this trend? do you click on all their nerdy crack-pot links?

Liberal-------you couldn't "BUY" a clue could you????? I'm NOT interested in your blogs or your links----I I wanted to dine on propaganda I would merely put the mouse down and click on television news---or click on any of their web site for that matter----------they all consistently trowel up that sewage and sludge ------garbage in = garbage out----NO--THANKS

your right-----some of the dead links might have been viable at one time but I see some of these jokers posting links to nothing at all. time wasters.

Answer 1

The links were probably valid at one point. A lot of links become dead ends when the actual website is removed.

If you want to see liberal propaganda, just turn on your television set, or click on the website of any major news service. You will be sure to get the latest propaganda on Global Warming, or whatever the latest scam is.

Answer 2

TRY THIS ONE:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14728447/

Senate report: No Saddam, al-Qaida link
Long-awaited analysis also finds that anti-Saddam group misled U.S.

Updated: 3:31 p.m. ET Sept 8, 2006
WASHINGTON - There’s no evidence Saddam Hussein had ties with al-Qaida, according to a Senate report issued Friday on prewar intelligence that Democrats say undercuts President Bush’s justification for invading Iraq.

Bush administration officials have insisted on a link between the Iraqi regime and terror leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. Intelligence agencies, however, concluded there was none.

The declassified document released Friday by the intelligence committee also explores the role that inaccurate information supplied by the anti-Saddam exile group the Iraqi National Congress had in the march to war.

It concludes that postwar findings do not support a 2002 intelligence community report that Iraq was reconstituting its nuclear program, possessed biological weapons or ever developed mobile facilities for producing biological warfare agents.

The 400-page report comes at a time when Bush is emphasizing the need to prevail in Iraq to win the war on terrorism while Democrats are seeking to make that policy an issue in the midterm elections.

It discloses for the first time an October 2005 CIA assessment that prior to the war Saddam’s government “did not have a relationship, harbor, or turn a blind eye toward Zarqawi and his associates.”

Bush and other administration officials have said that the presence of Zarqawi in Iraq before the war was evidence of a connection between Saddam’s government and al-Qaida. Zarqawi was killed by a U.S. airstrike in June this year.

Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., a member of the committee, said the long-awaited report was “a devastating indictment of the Bush-Cheney administration’s unrelenting, misleading and deceptive attempts” to link Saddam to al-Qaida.

The administration, said Sen. John D. Rockefeller, D-W.Va., top Democrat on the committee, “exploited the deep sense of insecurity among Americans in the immediate aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks, leading a large majority of Americans to believe — contrary to the intelligence assessments at the time — that Iraq had a role in the 9/11 attacks.”

The chairman of the committee, Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., said it has long been known that prewar assessments of Iraq “were a tragic intelligence failure.”

Answer 3

I prefer to see some sort of documentation when someone makes a statement, but you're right, some of the links people provide on here are absolutely laughable (when they actually work, that is)!

Answer 4

Try these:

--Dick Cheney, on why the US should not get involved in a civil war in Iraq:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGIe1gPaTXY&mode=related&search=

--Stars and Stripes poll from last year showing that 72% of troops thought LAST MARCH that we should get out of Iraq within a year.

http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=34538&archive=true

Answer 5

Hitler had an illogical hatred of the Jews and he wasn't even German. He became born in Austria. As a youthful guy he had utilized to the Vienna college of arts and became rejected. The board consisted of many Jews, which flamed the fireplace. there is even rumor that his mom became Jewish, which accordig to Jewish and then later Nazi regulation would have made him Jewish. The Germans have been in a terrible melancholy after WW I and dealt with with malice and indignity with the help of something of Europe via fact of ways they destruyed Europe in WW I. Hitler had to have somebody to blame this on and the Jews have been his scapegoat. He confident the German those that their issues have been the fault of the Jews. He used all the Jewish sterotypes he would desire to, which comprise telling the Germans the Jews owned the banks and economic institutions and weren't suffering, whilst the fact became the German Jews have been suffering as plenty via fact the Gentile Jews. He had a great propaganda administer, Goebels, who began having the Jews portrayed as sub-people, used exaggerated, distorted stereotypical photos of Jews in Germans papers, showing them to seem completely different than non-Jewish Germans. extensive thick lips, extensive ears and noses and Germans have been advised that Jews participated in ceremonies the place they drank the blood of organic Christian toddlers. Being interior the desperate challenge the German people have been in, they have been waiting to have faith something. the unhappy section is that the German Jews seen themselves Germans fiirst and Jews 2d. They have been proud of their German historical past or perhaps disliked with the help of Jews in different eu international places as being German snobs. fairly Hitler became struggling with 2 wars. A conflict against the Jews and of direction the WW II, the place he needed all of Europe to be German, as a result his invasion of one united states after the different. Had the U.S. no longer gotten into WW II and Hitler had succeeded in invading England, issues would have became out plenty in a different way than it did.

Answer 6

I don't. Anything from anyone can get posted on a web site. I have see people use blogs as references.
Info on the Internet cannot be independently verified as accurate. So I don't believe any of the claims.

Answer 7

I have found more crackpot sites and dead links but mostly no links from from Bush apologist propagandists. I doubt you are interested in the truth at any rate.

Answer 8

Liberals can't make a complete thought.

Let's elect hillary and let another clinton make a joke out of the whitehouse.

Answer 9

Only people who want to silence dissent and deny others the right to speak try to label what they dislike as "subversive." In short--only people who are unAmerican.

Is that really what you want to have people think you are?

Answer 10

just because you dont like the info that are on these sites does not make it wako or untrue. stay with fox and rush, they need you mindless people like you.