English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

I do. I don't think it was intentional (because she was worth more to him alive than dead), he just kept her drugged up so that no one could talk sense into her about dumping the gold-digger, but it all back-fired on his sorry a**. Her body could not take it all especially with the grief and I'm quite sure that she wasn't eating properly or else she would have had a more fighting chance of survival. He's a SNAKE.

2007-04-05 09:39:16 · answer #1 · answered by Slim Shady 5 · 0 0

I know this sounds crazy. But I've got this theory that nobody has considered. It sounds really crazy! But just maybe, Anna Nicole and her son both killed them selves unwittingly by their VOLUNTARY use of various drugs including Methadone!

Why does every thing have to be a conspiracy?

Believe me, Anna Nicole was worth more to Howard when she was alive. He had no reason to kill her.

2007-04-08 20:00:55 · answer #2 · answered by jloertscher 5 · 0 0

It's tough because while he might not have crammed them down her throat, he was a HUGE enabler and did nothing to stop her, especially while she was pregnant. I mean that clown video says it all. His sitting on his duff while she slowly killed herself makes him culpably negligent in my book. I mean if any doctor came to me and prescribed over 11 drugs and then had them sent in my name because there was NO WAY that the doctor would have been able to get them to Anna Nicole otherwise, would have been an enormous wake up call. His demeanour also seems to indicate that he might just not only be an enabler but a user as well.

2007-04-05 08:52:58 · answer #3 · answered by thequeenreigns 7 · 0 0

i think of he had lots to do with it, and her sons demise. until now the post-mortem document replaced into given it replaced into rumored that for the duration of ordinary terms Valium and an antibiotic, the two perceptions with the call of Howard Stern, have been got here upon interior the hotel room. previous due final evening on CNN a reporter from the famous man or woman magazine reported that countless prescriptions have been got here upon, all in Stern's call, including methadone. This makes me ask your self approximately what Stern did to them. i be attentive to that's going to take 3 to 5 weeks to get each and all of the toxicology comments back, how unusual will or no longer that's in the event that they locate an identical drugs in Anna that have been contemporary in her son. i'm going to easily say this, sure i think of Stern used Anna and observed vast $$$$$ whilst he regarded at her. He controlled each component of her existence. If a number of you do no longer see how this might take place then you certainly are fortunate adequate to have lived a blessed existence. whilst human beings like Anna, that have had a no longer so suited or generic existence, come into touch with somebody who is conscious the thank you to administration and use human beings, like Stern, she gave her existence over to him because of fact she replaced right into a scared little lady and he or she fell for his b.s. How handy to make it look like suicide or an overdose. unusual how issues finally end up. All prescriptions have been in Sterns call, that's what makes me ask your self the main.

2016-10-21 03:00:11 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I don't think he shoved the pills down Anna's throat, I'm sure she had no problem doing that herself, but Howard certainly didn't seem like he was trying to protect the woman he supposedly loved so much. If he lived with her, I'm sure he knew how much crap she was putting into her system. He should have done something about it. Although 99% of the blame is on her for doing that to herself.

2007-04-05 08:49:16 · answer #5 · answered by cynthiajean222 6 · 1 0

I think it was an accident because she had flu-like symptoms and she was having a lot of depressions. And mixing antihistamines and some antidepressants can kill you. So I think it was an honest mistake. That's the same thing Gerald Levert died from.

2007-04-06 06:17:27 · answer #6 · answered by bri22sweet 1 · 0 0

I don't think he forced her to take those drugs. I don't think he did much to talk her out of taking them either. She was addicted to those drugs and she would have and could have gotten the drugs with or without his help.

2007-04-05 09:39:54 · answer #7 · answered by nite_raideress 4 · 0 0

I don't think he actually killed her but he allowed her to take all of that mess. I guess that makes him an accessory. A fortune hunting accessory!

2007-04-05 08:39:48 · answer #8 · answered by robee 7 · 1 0

I think he did just by neglect.

2007-04-05 11:43:56 · answer #9 · answered by Sunshine Suzy 5 · 0 0

I do, I think he wants all of her moolah =O

2007-04-05 08:48:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers