English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

35 answers

You can't be serious. He attacked a country over a pack of lies for crying out loud..

2007-04-05 12:16:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Are you on crack? You think starting a war and finding no WMD's is effective global policy?

There are about 10 hostile countries we don't even talk to. How's that an effective policy?

He spends all his free time on the God damn ranch? He's the most vacationed president EVER!

Stop drinking the coolaid.

2007-04-05 08:41:51 · answer #2 · answered by ScooterLibby 3 · 2 0

He's been incredibly effective at destroying any and all pro-US feelings around the globe. He's effectively started a civil war in Iraq. He's effectively allowed North Korea to build a nuke. He's effectively alienated every major country except Britain, and they'll vote Blair out and replace him with a Bush-hater this year. He's effectively ignored Darfur. He's effectively allowed the herion crop in Afghanistan to flourish again by doing nothing to help them rebuild the infrastructre we bombed. He's effectively gotten 3200 US troops killed and tens of thousands maimed in a war to find WMDs that effectively weren't there.

About the only thing Bush is effective at is screwing up. And he's VERY effective at that.

2007-04-05 08:41:15 · answer #3 · answered by Chredon 5 · 2 2

Because they lost their guts for the war on terror. They forgot the pain they felt when America was attacked. They want the world to like them, even though it makes no difference.
It has always been a fact that protesters, usually Liberal, hate war, regardless of its necessity, they want attention, and they want the White House. They are a selfish, spoiled group of people, who are Socialist, don't want progression or success, but wants the government to care for them. Peace, love, sex, and drugs, are their motto. It has always been so. They did it in Vietnam, they're glory days, and they want that back again. Bush is a fighter, and won't take crap off of anyone. They don't like that. They like laying on the beach with no worries, and smoking weed. They're youthful, green, and don't understand the ways of the world. They hate strength in anyone, and Bush is Americas strength right now. They don't realize, without war, there is no peace.

PS to someone before me who said Reagan never fired a shot. Yes he did. He bombed Kadafi's house when Kadfi was highjacking American airplanes, and killing American soldiers on those planes, and Kadafi's adopted daughter was killed. Kadfi himself was not at home, in Lybia.

2007-04-05 08:45:49 · answer #4 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 0 2

The Russians tried to take Afghanistan for 9 years and were driven out in ignoble defeat. Bush did it in a few months. Pretty effective huh!

He Destroyed Iraq's army (The 4th largest in the world at the time) in a matter of months. Pretty effective huh?

All that's left is a pack of cowardly assassins who are the most racist people on the face of the earth. Those who won't show their faces and who kill women and children because they can't win in a fair fight. I say, he should continue to fight the war on terror because the terrorists will never change their racist ideals.

2007-04-05 08:41:53 · answer #5 · answered by Homeschool produces winners 7 · 1 3

Are you on drugs? 500billion for unnecessary war. Thousands killed. No negotiations with North Korea for many years now flip on that. Effective?

US is the least regarded country right now! Are you proud of this?

2007-04-05 08:41:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

I don't hate Bush, I love Bush! Who told you that I h...

Oh, wait, you mean the president...

never mind.

2007-04-05 08:54:07 · answer #7 · answered by Darth Vader 6 · 0 2

I agree. It's kind of like they lured him into a trap. Nearly everyone was in favor of the war, including a bi-partisan Congress. Now, so many people criticize him for the war (which is turning course) and every thing he says. These are sad, sad, sorry little people who need instant gratification and when they do not get it they lash out against the nearest big target.

2007-04-05 08:33:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6 4

I'm curious as to your definition of effective?

2007-04-05 08:45:21 · answer #9 · answered by pip 7 · 1 1

Global Policy...riiiiight: Like bombing two countries back to the stone age, threating two other countries to the same effect and essentially creating a atmosphere of hate towards the U.S.A.?


That's what I call progress

2007-04-05 08:33:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5 6

fedest.com, questions and answers