Are Americans Proud Of Nancy Pelosi After Hearing News Of This?

Question

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_040407/content/01125109.html.guest.html

Answer 1

You explained it right in your link. You listen to the drug addled gas bag.
Have you ever heard of the adage, when in Rome do as the Romans do.
When people come here, you want them to follow the rules here, therefore why should she ignore theirs? Just because twits who do not understand diplomacy don't? Puhleeze

Answer 2

People using the "When in Rome" reasoning to explain away Nancy Pelosi's departure from sanity are making me ill. If Nancy truly wanted to follow the Middle Eastern Way - she would have lobbed a few Muslim heads off for the American people that have lost their lives because of these murderers.

Answer 3

i like Nancy Pelosi She stands up for what's m_____f___n stunning! And in case you haven't any longer cracked a historic past e book in a jointly as, we've been given out a*** WHOOPED in Vietnam ANd we can't the 1st step foot into North Korea because of fact all of us be attentive to they have weapons of Mass Destruction So quit being an inflated patriot and awaken and scent the coffee

Answer 4

Im no fan of Pelosi but I think Rush is pushing the division in America to the brink. He twists the truth to make his point and a few more million dollars.

Answer 5

Tourists who visits mosques do this as it's not allowed for women to enter without a cover for their hair. All politicians and wives of politicians did the same. She didn't wear it in the street or in her room.
Only closed minded people and ignorant or full of hate may wish that she would have done something else. Pelosi tries to tell the world that in America still some politicians can use their minds and can listen and speak with others.
I wonder what the group of puppets in the administration did to the American community.
Are you still asking whose puppets they are?

Answer 6

The link you provided is for Rush 24/7 members only and requires a fee. I can imagine that the article was about Ms. Pelosi's trip to Syria.

Perhaps Ms. Pelosi just does not have a good understanding of the Muslim world and the quest for power and world domination. I am especially convinced of that because she favors establishment of the "nuclear fuel bank" although a country like Iran has the capability of further enriching "nuclear fuel" to be pure enough (U235) to provide fissile material for a nuclear bomb.

On April 10, 2997, an article written by Carla Mariunucci appeared in the San Francisco Chronicle, indicating that Ms. Pelosi and Rep. Lantos are interested in making a "diplomatic trip" to Iran.
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/04/10/BAGV9P6C0S6.DTL
Pelosi, Lantos may be interested in diplomatic trip to Iran
Furthermore, the article quoted Rep Lantos as saying that he co-sponsored legislation with Ms. Pelosi which could pass as early as May that calls for making available to all countries --including Iran -- nuclear fuel for peaceful purposes under international oversight by establishing a "nuclear fuel bank".

I believe that the legislation is:
HR 6 Clean Energy Act of 2007
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=110_cong_bills&docid=f:h6ih.txt.pdf

Those who advocate the "nuclear fuel bank" consider that clean nuclear technology would be available to all countries. However, those who argue against the "nuclear fuel bank" point out that the uranium enrichment process (using centrifuges to separate isotopes as in the FEP at Natanz, Iran) can also be used to produce a more pure grade of uranium 235 which may be used in a nuclear bomb.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4416482.stm
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/09/28/opinion/edbuffett.php
http://www.goodharborreport.com/node/295

The head of the Iranian Nuclear Energy Organization, Gholam-Reza Aghazadeh, explains it thus:
The simple way is to inject 0.7% (uranium) and obtain 3.5%, right? Now, if you take this 3.5% and inject it again into the chain (of centrifuges), the result will be 20%. If you inject the 20% back into the chain, the result will be 60%. If you inject this 60%, the result will be 90%.
http://www.memritv.org/Transcript.asp?P1=1120
http://www.memritv.org/Search.asp?ACT=S6&P1=2,148&P3=4

Since Iran has uranium enrichment capabilities at its FEP (fuel enrichment plant) at Natanz, giving Iran nuclear "fuel" enriched to 3.5% might not be a good idea if Iran does have the agenda to develop a nuclear bomb.

The BBC article (listed below) describes the nuclear fuel process.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/sci_nat/05/nuclear_fuel/html/mining.stm

Answer 7

Your source is a viagra and oxy-conton crazed egomaniac.
I certainly will not log on and allow a cookie to infect my computer. It's imbeciles like him who have change the Republican Party from Reagan Conservatives to Bush Nazis

Would she have to cover her head in an orthodox Jewish Temple?

Answer 8

Jeez, Rush Limp paw, what a brilliant source. I don't see anyone crying and gnashing their teeth when American reporters go to these countries and wear a burka. I applaud Nancy Pelosi for showing Bush what real "Diplomacy" is.

Answer 9

Like I'm going to log into Rush Oxycontin Limbaugh's site just to expose your lies. Put it in writing.

Answer 10

No!!! Shes an embarrassment to our country, it comes to no surprise that she is from California. We need to strip her of citizenship and send her straight to kitmo and lock her up for her treason against this great country

Answer 11

I couldn't even get past the first sentence.

The fact that people think she wore a head scarf because she was trying to demonstrate how subservient women should be is completely asinine.

A woman showing her hair in public, in Syria, is akin to a woman masturbating in public here. It is considered obscene.

She wore the head scarf to show respect to her hosts, as a visiting foreign diplomat. Laura Bush did the same damn thing when she visited the Middle East. Pictures of this are ALL OVER THE INTERNET.