2007-04-05 06:01:00 · 22 answers · asked by killa d 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Liberalism has little to do with the truth.
Example: Bush won Florida and Gore conceded. Then Gore took back his concession and ran to the Florida Supreme Court. GOT THAT? GORE ran to the court FIRST.
The very liberal Florida Supreme Court, being liberal had little interest with the truth, began to order illegal recounts in only certain districts in DIRECT VIOLATION OF THE STATE CONSTITUTION. Bush was then forced to go to the Federal Supreme Court who stopped the lawlessness in Florida.
Interesting side note: Even though several illegal recounts were conducted in those districts, Gore never had more votes. Not a single time.
Now this is the truth.
And it is still true that the Florida Supreme Court has nothing to do with elections. Elections and how they are conducted and how recounts are conducted and what type of ballots will be used is strictly the job of the Legislature.
PERIOD end of story. Now get over it.
.
2007-04-05 06:17:08 · answer #1 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
because if they admitted that our supposed Democratic process was canceled and corrupted it would cause anarchy. The fact that over 16,000 votes in volusia county were transferred from Gore to some obscure third party candidate at 10 pm election night after a secondary "memory card upload" to the voting machine is extremely suspect. Especially given the fact that the election was decided by just over 500 votes. The election was decided by a conservative Supreme Court, in the State ran by the Winners brother with the voting controlled by the winners Campaign manager and broadcast by the winners Cousin (Production Supervisor at Fox News). Look at all that has happened as a result of that election and ask yourself "was it just a coincidence?" And I say, when there is that much money and power at stake there are no coincidences.
2007-04-05 13:14:38 · answer #2 · answered by Myles D 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The truth is that in 2000 more people in this country wanted Gore for president than wanted Bush. What part of that is a lie?
2007-04-05 13:25:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why can't the right just admit that they've learned to steal an election and keep it stolen??
And as I recall there were two reviews done, the one counting the way Bush wanted shows Gore winning and the one counting the way Gore wanted shows Bush winning. Hence the unjustified intervention by the supremes - Bushies needed a sure thing.
2007-04-05 13:09:44 · answer #4 · answered by ash 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
The truth is if you're too stupid to handle a voting machine or ballot, than you shouldn't be voting, period.
The left got out the vote alright. The elderly and infirm, the poor and illiterate, and the questionable (ie. voting in New York and Florida, non-citizens, and felons). Then they gave them poor instructions on how to complete the ballot to their satisfaction. When they realized this, they thought they could then steal the election in the courts, and they failed.
Watch out. They will again attempt all of this stupidity in 2008.
2007-04-05 13:10:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
It is much more exciting to believe that the election was stolen than to see the truth that Gore lost in accordance with election law in Florida.
2007-04-05 13:07:46 · answer #6 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
the truth is gore had the popular vote, bush got the office, and many now feel uneasy about how votes are counted
2007-04-05 14:28:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The truth would mean that they lost and then they would have to realize that all of America does not think the same way they do. if they lie to themselves then they can just go on believing that all conservatives are hillbilly rednecks who are racists and hate women.
2007-04-05 13:15:15 · answer #8 · answered by jim_2ooo 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The truth is that a group of newspapers set up a recount and no matter how you slice it, Bush won.
2007-04-05 13:08:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
The truth about the 2000 election is that America has been suffering for it ever since.
2007-04-05 13:04:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 7⤋