L.Klusener
Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 4s 6s Ct St
Tests 49 69 11 1906 174 32.86 3187 59.80 4 8 236 20 34 0
ODIs 171 137 50 3576 103* 41.10 3977 89.91 2 19 293 76 35 0
S.Jayasuriya
Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 4s 6s Ct St
First-class 2 2 0 11 9 5.50 82 13.41 0 0 1 0
List A 6 6 0 62 25 10.33 126 49.20 0 0 6 1
Twenty20 1 1 0 1 1 1.00 8 12.50 0 0 0 0 0 0
S.Afridi
Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 4s 6s Ct St
Tests 26 46 1 1683 156 37.40 1954 86.13 5 8 216 50 10 0
ODIs 238 226 10 4998 109 23.13 4598 108.69 4 27 468 225 83 0
Twenty20 Int. 2 2 0 35 28 17.50 27 129.62 0 0 5 1 0 0
Judge yourself
2007-04-05 06:05:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Sanath Jayasuriya is the best allrounder among the three as compared to Lance Klusener and Shahid Afridi as he is the most consistent as compared to other two.
2007-04-05 19:52:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Santosh 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
According to me Sanath Jayassuriya is the best allrounder as compared to Lance Klusener and Shahid Afridi as he is most consistent as compared to other two.
2007-04-05 10:14:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by vakayil k 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Klusener at his peak, bowling around 140km/h and batting like he did at the '99 World Cup, would easily be the best all-rounder of these three.There are many all-rounders who are far better than Klusener, though, today and in days gone by. The best cricketer and batsman of this lot would still have to be Jayasuriya!Jayasuriya is more of a batsman who bowls occasionally.His fielding is also top drawer. Afridi often comes off with bat and ball,but is not reliable.
2007-04-05 06:29:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by doji star 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Sanath Jayasuriya. He Done This from Lot Of Time.He Can Win A
Compleat Macht By Him Self If He Score Abou 100. 99% Sri Lanka will Win The Match if He didnt Score He Will Do It By Bowling And Felding. THAT"S IT.
2007-04-05 09:12:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
From your list, i would certainly choose Shahid Khan Afridi. No doubt world most powerful exciting hitter and what differentiate him from other hitter is that he is consistently hitting balls out of the park for last 8 years and getting better and better.
He is good bowler as well, has fastest delivery of 135 km/h.. , Has good leg break and off break, that makes him better bowler than his counter parts.
My favorite all rounder, other than shahid afridi , is Abdur Razzak. Due to his good bowling especially his venomous in dipper that breaks the defenses of batsmen of any caliper around the world .To his credit, He has hat-trick in Test match against Srilanka.
His batting is not less exciting either.A Good Clean Hitter. He is the only batsmen to hit five consecutive boundaries in an over against Australian Great Glenn Mcgrath. (in Australia). Not only that , he is also a great finisher. And perfectly capable of switching gears.
2007-04-05 13:44:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by aliaan 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Klusener
2007-04-05 21:00:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Paresh P 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
None of the above,although Lance deserve such a title but the best by far is Kallis with his stats he can open bat and open the bowling.He achieve this in both test and one day and now currently in the world cup he is superb form.I believe he will be the first cricketer to reach 10 000 runs and 300 wickets in both test and one day
2007-04-05 22:12:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by capeflatsking 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Best Answer - Chosen by Asker
Master blaster Sanath Jayasuriya has the most wickets in one day arena . 290 wickets & he is gonna pass 300 in this world cup. so it's fair to comment he is th best among afridi clusner .Sanath Jayasuriya brought a new diamention & new revival to one day arena.Matt hayden is just agood batsmen.(with due respect.
Jayasuriya now 4 th best all rouder in ODI ...so he broke sixers recrd too.
Yeah. you've risen aquestion of autmost importance,
Regarding 2007 cricket world cup.
They are in a good shape.They have flair & talent.
Now most immportantly they hanve rekindled their ability to win in alien ,overseas conditions.
They proved that in Guyana's newest stadium..
They defeated star studded Indian team with clinical aproach.
South Africans escaaped unscathed by desimal points.
As Mahela puts..........."It's time to be ruthless".
Can you remember,..It was supposed to ...be Indian's, world cup this time.
Sachin being senior most he should have waited until right moment comes.
But these blokes from Sri Lanka had other ideas.
Furthermore it was 250 runs to get....
Lankans got it by running between wickets.
They have come of age now.
Australian dominance may decline in near fure in front of these fighting Sri Lankans....Nobody knows..
We have solid facts for that....
SL has upper hand...for future games..
Its all the way for Asian Teams
No more 'Old-English-gentelmen' ruling the Cricket World.
But see how they became top of the world right now...
Though they beat india They still had to give their best ever performance..
They almost won with South Africa.,by Malinga heroics.
Now It's Sri Lanka's time to be Called As,...
"Star- studded Cricket team of World cup -2007"
Their.. ballers and fielders taught how to win when you ,balling second time.
When Robin Uthappa and Sourav Ganguly walked in, India had a target of just 255 runs, on a wicket which had dried and gone flatter. It was Dravd's flurry of fours off Malinga in one over that had raised the hopes of Indian fans just for a while.
Anybody can be so sure that ,the turning point was Sachin’s getting out to Big-Fernando, through the gate for a duck.
That was a vital blow. India could not recover.Like wise when Jayasuriya in Lankan side ....so....other ballers dont know where to pitch the ball.. when sanath dance down the wicket...ha ha ... And Vass on full flaw any thing can happen.
History may repeat this time like 1996.
Whatever little chances India had went up in flames
when Yuvraj was run out by Lankans.
They made presure on much favoured Indians.
Next time, Australia,New Zealand & England have feel the presure.
It is really worth analysing the difference between the two teams from the sub-continent. India’s strength was batting and given the proper conditions, their medium pacers and the spinners could be devastating.
If not, Indian's shoulders start drooping and the bowling goes haywire with all kind of experimentations. It could happen to the batting too.All those things happe
Exactly opposite are Sri Lanka, except that their batting is as good if not better. We were the big brothers when they started. Now they are the elders. What an irony. They are better fielders for sure, and the bowlers bowl to the field under any circumstances unless it’s a completely off day for them.
Muralitharan,Vass,Malinga is just outstanding. And most importantly, they play as a team and not as individuals. And that’s the thin line that differentiated the two teams. We saw absolutely no regional biases, despite all kinds of problems in their small country.They had civil war,& Tsunami.
But still they rise like legendery phinix bird.
So wait,fans more fire works yet to come...
They now have to beat only 3 teams to advance easyly to much awaited semi finals.
Jaya--means victory suriya means Sun.
when he looks at the sun ......he get 's energy to destroy big bowlers!!
long live Sanath !!!!
Long live cricket !!!!!!!
2007-04-05 08:10:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
By seeing long term Sanath Jaysuria is best , But in lance klusener period he is the best one..
2007-04-05 08:16:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Sivaji 2
·
0⤊
1⤋