Is it a bad sign for San Fran Nan that Jimmy Carter endorsed her trip to Syria? Seeing Carter's stellar record on dealing with terrorist is a little off.
2007-04-05 03:38:15 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Right on brother! two nuts in a shell.
2007-04-05 03:53:55 · answer #1 · answered by Streakin' Deacon 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think Nancy Pelosi is being more responsible than what what the Chimp President George Walker Dumb Dumb Bush has been. Bush is such a Sociopathic Liar and only cares about what he figures is right in his little Lah Lah Land World.
The puke of a President has ignored what the majority of Americans wanted and that is an end to the War in Iraq but Dumb Dumb Bush has his own way or the highway attitude and the Peckerhead could care less what the majority of Americans think.
When the puke is done as President that will be the day for 70% of Americans to rejoice as well as people around the World.
2007-04-05 11:15:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not at all. George Bush could take a lesson from her and others who don't have a closed mind about Syria and other countries his administration have alleged are state sponsors of terrorism. As long as Dubya continues to refuse to deal with the major players in the Middle East, none of the problems there will be solved. He's got a mindset where things will only be done his way or not at all, and doesn't seem to understand that he doesn't own the world. That's one of the reasons Poor George is and always will be a failure as president.
2007-04-05 10:54:32 · answer #3 · answered by MathBioMajor 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The Iran hostage situation was a big disaster. Carter refused to give into the demands of the Shah and there were several failed rescue attempts. The Algiers Accord was a demeaning negotiation. Funny though, the hostages were released minutes after Regan took office.
But since leaving the White House, Jimmy Carter's personal diplomacy has helped to defuse international crises in hot spots from North Korea to Haiti. In 2002, he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts.
2007-04-05 10:51:18 · answer #4 · answered by Global warming ain't cool 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
I don't understand why they are so angry with her going over there. The Republicans have done it before without anyone fussing. And as far as Carter goes, he's a good guy, just wasn't sure how to be a good President.
2007-04-05 11:01:09 · answer #5 · answered by kungfufighting66 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well we should of sent Jimmy Carter over there. He's playing bball with Kim Jong Ill right now probably
Wonder why he hasn't seen his good buddy Fidel?
2007-04-05 10:41:51 · answer #6 · answered by John 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Jimmy carter the best and smortest president ever.
2007-04-05 10:45:05 · answer #7 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Nobody crashed planes into US buidings killing thousands of citizens on Carters watch....
2007-04-05 10:47:30 · answer #8 · answered by Carpe diem 6 · 1⤊ 5⤋
The Cons on here are really worked up about Pelosi's trip....she must be doing something right :)
2007-04-05 10:41:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 7⤋
No. It should help her if anything.
2007-04-05 10:40:53 · answer #10 · answered by nom de paix 4 · 1⤊ 5⤋