Do you trust George Bush to lead America?

Question

Has King George the Decider lost all respect for the American people he is supposed to serve? Can the Republic survive until his term ends?

#####

April 4, 2007, 6:17 PM CDT

WASHINGTON -- First, President Bush nominated Sam Fox, a St. Louis businessman and major Republican fundraiser, to be ambassador to Belgium. Then he withdrew the nomination when he saw it would fail in the Senate. And now he has appointed him while Congress is out of town and can't stop Fox from getting the job.

#####

Answer 1

i dont think i'll ever see such a failure in grand power again in my lifetime. it's almost like a cheezy movie where the king of some country dies and his idiot little brother has to rule in place. if you write down all the things that he's failed in his life and showed it to someone who'd never heard of bush or what he's done, theres no chance they'd believe all those blunders could be caused by one person, they'd say it was fictional.

-also, just so everyone's aware, the US government were the ones who trained Osama in terrorism, and rather than go after Osama, he STARTED A WAR IN IRAQ.

the war in Iraq is NOT the same as the war on terror.
i wouldnt trust Bush to lead a kindergarten bakesale

Answer 2

You may think that Bush 43 brought shame to America, but I think he did all right considering the near constant ridicule and lack of support he received from some Americans. Bush 43 could not walk across the room without some person haranguing him. The real shame and disgrace was the actions of some Americans in the face of a real and serious threat to the safety of our people. He took on a wide-ranging and well financed enemy that was deeply entrenched and quite capable of causing serious damage. But, because of the Liberal Left, the press, and many half-wit celebrities, he had to fight this battle, for us, virtually alone. THAT is the real SHAME brought on to America. I hope that, if you are one of those people, that you are proud of yourself. I trusted George W. Bush, but there is a whole long list of people that I now don't trust.

Answer 3

Liberals begin name calling, the moment a republican is in office. The repeating of negativity by the liberal media took hold when Bush made the mistake to invade Iraq. However, if Gore had successfully stolen the election (boy did he try to), there would have been repeats of 911. The liberal media will never give Bush credit for that because they would have to admit their candidate would never have defended the USA. Just because Bush made mistakes does not mean the Pelosi, Kennedy, Clinton socialists are good or a better choice.

Answer 4

Lead America? That's a tough question. Has anyone bothered to look and see the people are leading the way, not the figurehead. I do have my reservations about his concern about sending mixed messages to the world when others come forward to speak I am concerned when one wants to be the only voice among many. and the one being the only mouth piece. George, let America talk too. after all how can we be family if there is only one voice who has chosen the smartest things to say. We are Family. let's keep it that way. ok? have a nice day family.

Answer 5

Bush will only be president for about a year and a half more, then we will probably get ether Hillary or Borack ant that what everyone is looking forward to look at Nancy Pelosie she wore a scarves on her head bowed down like a good puppet maybe she is just practicing for when democrats get into power hip hip hooray.

Answer 6

I did at first trust him but when the second term of presidency came along I was keeping my fingers crossed that he would make it another term. i think we as citizens are deeper in crap expecially with the war in Iraq with him being president. Let us just hope we have a better president to lead our country the next go around.

Answer 7

I think any President that is handed a war is doomed to failure on the public opinion poles...he/she can never please everyone. And, yes, I said handed a war. If his father had done the job right and Clinton hadn't missed the boat on Osama, we wouldn't be where we are today.

Political appointees...big friggin deal. An ambassador is the key hand-shaker...his pet monkey could do the job.

I still maintain one fact...I would rather fight Iraq and Afganistan ... IN... Iraq and Afganistan than in New York, LA and Chicago!

Answer 8

Not really.

I am glad, however, that Bush and the terrorists were able to agree on the "No Terrorists in the U.S. Treaty". Having the terrorists agree to fight us in Iraq and Afghanistan, and stay off of the U.S. mainland, was a BRILLIANT idea.

I still don't know how Bush convinced the terrorists to sign the treaty, but I'm glad he did it.

Bush did make one stupid capitulation in the treaty, though. Why did he agree to allow the terrorists to come to the U.S., if we happen to leave Iraq? That seems a little strange to me.
Now we have to stay in Iraq FOREVER.

Answer 9

I trust Mr. Bush more than anything that the biased media say about him. They have an obvious agenda

Answer 10

I trust him 110%. He has done everything he has said he would do in the manner he said it when he was elected. There hasn't been any big surprise that he would do whatever it takes to take care of us.
I think the congress has been a bigger disappointment than he is. They are holding this country from going forward. The president cannot run this country by himself but a lot of people think he is. Congress needs to take their share of the responsibility too.