2007-04-05 00:09:15 · 17 answers · asked by pcrao_5 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
You will because you spell spectacularly.
2007-04-05 00:12:25 · answer #1 · answered by JOHN D 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Cute play on words... I think the only precedent will be with the Dem nomination, but not necessarily with the presidential election.
2007-04-05 08:15:01 · answer #2 · answered by steddy voter 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You have to ask this again.
What do you mean "Precedent"
Don't you ever read your "Questions"?
But your answer to "President" will have to be ....... anyone that has never been in showbusiness.
Thank God we don't vote on Stardom over here in New Zealand.
I really hope that it is a WOMAN that is the next President of the United States .... will put you all in your place.
We have had WOMEN as our Primeministers for years now ..... and I will keep on voting for them.
2007-04-05 08:01:01 · answer #3 · answered by Chris 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Having a female president would make a nice precedent.
2007-04-05 07:17:23 · answer #4 · answered by Puppy Zwolle 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Hillary Clinton.
2007-04-05 07:23:27 · answer #5 · answered by sagarukin 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Kelly
2007-04-05 07:12:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton.
2007-04-05 07:14:12 · answer #7 · answered by nik 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
It better be Hilary because she would at least have the experiences of her husband behind her. It's like being a President all over again. Clinton should be able to give her plenty of good advise.
2007-04-05 10:34:11 · answer #8 · answered by mari 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If he runs, Fred Thompson. If not, it will be someone that's not in the headlines yet. People will be too sick of the current candidates by the time the Primaries role around.
2007-04-05 09:08:47 · answer #9 · answered by USC MissingLink 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not sure what type of precedent you are trying to set....
2007-04-05 07:24:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Put Mr Bean there, noone will notice the difference.
2007-04-05 07:12:59 · answer #11 · answered by Kimon 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋