Im going for Becks cos no-one else has.What you also need to consider is David is also a captain of teams he's played in,a leader.Where he has to lead his players,Ugly Ron has a free role on what he want to do,(or NOT do as in the case of the CL game with Liverpool)!
2007-04-07 00:47:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by eddieafcb 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ronaldinho without a doubt. That's not to say Beckham is not a good player, but Ronaldinho is better, and more consistent.
2007-04-05 05:31:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by LMS 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ronaldinho.
2007-04-05 09:35:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by foongwk140804 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
What a Question !?!!
Ronaldinho is much better !
of course, Beckham is also better, but only as an advertisement object , not Football player !
2007-04-05 06:46:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by sinabala 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ronaldinho is the better of the two I think.
He has more flair and scorching pace.
Beckham is good but I think he is overated.
But..if Beckham is that good then why does he want to play for the L.A., wotsits. The best football in the world comes from or is played in the UK. I have never rated him highly.
2007-04-05 05:29:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Walter 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
whilst ronaldinho has a face only a mother could love, he is by far a better player than beckham. he has more talent in his elbow than beckham EVER had in his career. beckham is a product of the British media.
2007-04-05 05:29:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ronaldinho by far. Beckham is too one dimensional relying on his freekicks and deep crossing from the right.No pace, crap talker and not as much vision or creativity as people think.Overhyped.
2007-04-05 08:43:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Nijuu 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ronaldinho!!!! r u mad beckhams not even good
2007-04-06 16:20:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ronaldinho is far better
2007-04-05 05:42:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by DX 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is not even close: Ronaldinho
2007-04-05 09:11:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by SoccerClipCincy 7
·
0⤊
0⤋