John Howard of Australia is a great friend of America,Tony Blair showed courage going against his own liberal labor party.
2007-04-04 21:26:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Hector 4
·
4⤊
3⤋
Angela Merkel of Germany seems to be the only really strong head of government in the major Western countries. I'm also fond of Romano Prodi in Italy. Most everyone else (Bush, despite the leading question, included) is either impotent, inefficient, or incompetent.
[Throw onto the list Francois Bayrou if he can pull a surprise victory in the French presidential election later this month. Nicolas Sarkozy might also turn out fine (his foreign and domestic platforms are quite good, but he still comes off as too self-serving and his history of backstabbing Jacques Chirac has been too hard to overlook), as well, but don't expect much out of Segolene Royal.]
2007-04-04 21:26:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by xiibaro 2
·
1⤊
4⤋
There are no great world leaders today. Who wants to take credit of 41 major wars in the world today, stripping of our natural resources, pestilence, starvation, ethnic cleansing campaigns, nuclear proliferation, terrorism, and the list of issues go on and on. No male or female leader has the power or influence to change the course of the world at this time.
2007-04-04 22:04:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by gone 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
this finished credit disaster -- happened because of the fact the banks stopped lending money to a minimum of one yet another. while the information pronounces that they are cutting the "fed money" fee -- this suggests that the Federal Reserve is cutting the pastime fee that banks can charge one yet another while they lend one yet another money. while the banks lend one yet another money-- that enables them to own loan your cash (to purchase autos, residences and so on). So- a substantial area of the credit disaster is the freezing of money. in case you circulate lower back into your heritage-- you will discover that FDR instituted regulations that positioned money into the financial equipment. The TVA did not paintings for loose. via putting money into the equipment - the rustic got here out of the large melancholy. Freezing spending is between the worst issues the government can do. it is going to in common terms make the financial equipment lock up extra and make the credit disaster worse. it is why you have not considered a gaggle of economist bounce on the McCain's freezing thought. it is why McCain has subsidized faraway from his place on Freezing spending in desire a three hundred Billion dollar application to purchase undesirable subprime loans. yet even then-- that plan is getting very undesirable comments. So- no- Obama isn't something like "W" and, in my humble opinion, Obama's plan is extra sound. Your vehicle's engine will lock up if it runs out of oil. The financial equipment will lock up if it runs out of money. money is the "oil" that keeps the gears in the financial equipment turning. it is why the plans to get the financial equipment going lower back all contain an infusion of money.
2016-10-02 05:12:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tony Blair
2007-04-04 22:24:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by dr_methanegasman 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
Kim Dae Young, the president of South Korea. Note: This is not Kim Young Ill (or however his name is spelled).
2007-04-04 21:42:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Nelson Mandela
2007-04-04 21:25:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
Tony Blair isnthe next great leader for supporting the US in its fight against terrorism.
2007-04-04 21:27:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
John Howard of Australia seems to be a strait shooter and appears to know we are in the fight for the long haul!
2007-04-04 22:05:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by S E 5
·
3⤊
3⤋
Jack Cherack of France.
2007-04-04 21:56:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋