America only starts wars it knows it can win. We don't pick on real world powers, just helpless nations.
2007-04-04 20:45:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by lcmcpa 7
·
8⤊
2⤋
China is really the other real player in the mideast. China would be growing even faster, but they have no oil within their borders-none. This whole war thing right now is all about the 50-100 years of oil left in the world and what the world looks like when the party is over. I'd expect China to move their chess piece in the next 10-15 years, once they see an opportunity for leverage, which might be Korea.
2007-04-12 09:24:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by cinemave 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Doesn't say anything about Israel leading the Ecstasy trade and I would never believe they could out produce American college students. If every American that wanted one had a pot plant in the back yard we wouldn't need to spend money killing people over it. The prisons would have room for murderers and thieves. Young people wouldn't have criminal records because of a substance not one tenth as deadly as beer. We would all laugh more. America needs to send troops to Pakistan and catch the Taliban and their opium growers in the middle and wipe them out once and for all. Even the Moderate Muslims should like that.
2016-05-17 21:16:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The World will have only 4 superpowers :
Western World (USA, European, Israel)
Muslim World
China
India
China and India will declare neutral and are watching the Religious War between Western World and Muslim World.
2007-04-04 21:11:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO!!! China would bomb us before we could gather enough soldiers to get on a plane. Their population is in the billions I believe. We can barely protect our country as it is. The war is over and our troops are still dying. I am sorry for the Iranians but Bush needs to bring our servicemembers home and concentrate on protecting us from other countries..
2007-04-04 21:46:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by mrsbasemore 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Our government all the way up to Bush(stupid) is corrupt, and he wants to bloviate, and show how macho that worthless piece of crap is, when its not his family being sent to war, to die for his ego, but no our government would be fools to try to jack up China. Well you know what, the lack of IQ over 6 in the white house, they might try.
2007-04-12 10:49:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by masterplumber75 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Iran, and N.Korea were a lot more dangerous then Iraq and yet we went to Iraq. Now that we are in Iraq it is a quagmire, exhausting our troops and if China wanted to make war we would be hard pressed to even defend ourselves. In answer to your question, no president in his right mind would take on China under these conditions. .
edit: there is need to worry with George Bush as president. .
2007-04-12 20:24:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, because Israel can handle themselves. Plus China is not interested in destroying any country except Taiwan or Tibet. The US may or may not intervene in the case of Taiwan. That is a very testy decision for the US to make. I don't think we would ever send troops to occupy China in any case. We have too many business investments in China. It would destroy our economy.
2007-04-04 20:47:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by gone 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
I don't think China will attack Israel because China does not want to war with anyone.
We just want peace.
2007-04-06 18:23:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by emilan 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
China owns so much U.S. cash reserves that if it wanted to, it would cripple the U.S. economy, not the other way around.
U.S. troops wouldn't be marching into Beijing.....diplomacy would be the only way, unless someone wanted to see a WWIII, and if it's U.S. vs China....I think that would be the end of the world.
2007-04-04 20:47:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
It would depend upon our diplomatic relations at the time. Right now, it would be beyond stupid to attack china. They have more people in their army then we have period.
2007-04-04 20:50:39
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋