English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Yet more lies from our glorious lame duck leader over the incursion of our sailors in Iranian waters. Does Tony really believe that ANYBODY believes anything he says anymore, especially after the Iraq (Non) WMD's tale?

2007-04-04 17:44:10 · 11 answers · asked by Gent 5 in News & Events Current Events

11 answers

Iran has every right to not trust America and Great Britain. History proves many facts. I believe people that have never heard of the 1953 coup in Iran by Americans and British who overthrew a democratically elected prime ministry and put in a tyrant like the Shaw do not have a clue. Wake up people, the propaganda about Iran is all about justifying another war. Iran was imperialized by the British because they arrogantly cheated and pilfered and wouldn't allow the Iranians to receive fair royalties on their own oil on their own land which the British had controlled. They wanted to take control of the oil to build their oil thirsty royal fleet. You will never hear CNN or Fox speaking about the 1953 coup which has been de-classified "Operation Ajax." If you don't believe me just type in "1953 Coup " "Mohammad Mosaddeq " (who made Time Magazine's man of the year) or "Operation Ajax" to better understand why there is so much hostility towards the West. It all makes since only when you are not blinded by propaganda and know history

2007-04-04 18:34:51 · answer #1 · answered by Introspective Girl 4 · 1 2

YES- He said Saddam could arm and launch WMD in 15 minuets even though analysts working for British intelligence knew this was false. #2 He lied again when he said the methods used to calculate over 600,000 civilians dead was faulty. Fact Ministry of Defense's chief scientific adviser Sir Roy Andersan said the methods where sound. Many other analysts backed his view and warned Blair not to attack the report.

It's a lie that everybody believed Saddam had WMD in fact UN weapon inspectors said there was no evidence only after Bush said he could no longer guarantee their safety they where forced to leave.

Ret. Gen. Anthony Zinni who was the former CENTCOM commander resigned as Collin Powell's special envoy to the Middle East. He said Saddam poised no immediate threat to are national security as the WMD program was destroyed during Operation Desert Fox. History has proved him correct.

Iraqi National Congress funded by American tax payers promoted the lies about WMD. In fact Ahmed Chalibi and his brother was behind the tall tale. German intellegence also said the Iraq scientist was not credible and CIA agents sent to interview this guy said he was not credible. In addition the whole yellow cake story in regards to Niger was a fabrication from an Italian secret agent.

Isn't funny that because Saddam was removed the strongest political group in the region is the Shiites allies of Iran. Who do you think is behind the ethnic cleansing of Iraq's ancient Christian community? Even the Wall Street Journal reported the only growth industry in Iraq is making coffins.

Lastly how come Reagan or Bush shed no crocodile tears when Saddam used chemical weapons against Iranians and Kurds durung the Iran-Iraq War. In fact Rumsfeld was sent to meet with Saddam to show America's support.

2007-04-04 19:33:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

No he shouldn't he has had his day in politics, in spite of the actuality that it replaced into like a breath of clean air for the full u . s . a . while Blairs labour got here to capability after the tory stench that replaced into, that clean air quickly grew to become stale.His social gathering ran up enormous debts for the rustic,created the area time paintings subculture by ability of giving money interior the form of working tax credit and new child tax credit to those with families and that they merely mandatory to paintings sixteen hours to get it,no longer something replaced into given to those human beings without families or whose childrens have been grown up we had to locate finished time employment at a similar time as the breeders lived in luxury off of our taxes. we choose an entire new tackle politics in Britain,we choose company minded human beings working the rustic who could make the rustic an asset incredibly than a burden,a social gathering who will supply up all of this money for no longer something subculture and create British marketplace owned by ability of Britain who hire British electorate and positioned British electorate first.by no ability take place however will it

2016-11-07 06:28:54 · answer #3 · answered by watt 4 · 0 0

If we are looking for known liars here, Ahmadinejad is your man, not Blair. Ahmadinejad is the guy who says the Holocaust never happened. Yeah, sure I'll believe him over Blair, naturally.
Even the Iranian government gave the correct coordinates for the sailors at first, then had to change them because they were in Iraqi waters.
(Everybody thought Saddam had WMD; in fact we know he had them before, because he used them. Even the people who opposed the invasion of Iraq thought he had them.)

2007-04-04 17:53:38 · answer #4 · answered by The First Dragon 7 · 4 3

In the USA, Tony Blair is respected and admired and he handled the Iran problem well.
When England gets a new Prime Minister, they will begin to see how lucky they were with Tony Blair.
Chaps - you ain't see nothing yet.

2007-04-04 18:43:15 · answer #5 · answered by fatsausage 7 · 2 2

I think he is loosing his touch over the entire machinary of politics.Must be really embarrissing for him for being caught holding dipproaportionate assets at a time when British troops in Iraq are screaming for higher facilities

2007-04-04 19:04:20 · answer #6 · answered by Spoorthy M 2 · 2 2

I feel sorry for Blair- too. He threw his "lot" in with Bush, and now HIS country feels the same way about HIM- as WE do about Bush! It just goes to show...- be careful who you hang out with! :)

2007-04-04 19:10:03 · answer #7 · answered by Joseph, II 7 · 1 2

He is smart and all brilliant minds let stuff play out just enough and then GOTCHA. You will see little man. And your little dog Nanci too.

2007-04-04 18:13:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

No.
Don't think so.
Look like a success in the creation of peace on earth goodwill to men for the good of mankind in planet of apes.
Should thank our brother out there.
Look at the picture how he jump for joy with "Ya' hoo" in hitting the home-run in the creation of peace on earth good will to men for the good of mankind in planet of apes.
Must be learning "He's ain't heavy, He's my brother" from faraway land in the creation of peace on earth goodwill to men for the good of mankind in planet of apes.
Should thank him for that and cheer him with "For he's a jolly good fellow" in the creation of peace on earth good will to men in planet of apes.
Looks like he learned how to be living human kind and not as people of different races of self racism in planet of apes.

2007-04-04 18:21:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Although they illegally entered our terotrial water we treated them as guest ( you can ask them when they arrive homeland ) this could be considered as our gift for easter to them .
i have a question form europeans ? suppose 15 iranians arrive your country with guns . do you think you would do same with them ?
or normally you put them in jail for few years ?
we are persian .

2007-04-04 18:24:19 · answer #10 · answered by AMIR L 1 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers