Is it bad of me to write a corporation and ask them to drug test an employee?

Question

It's at a gym and I suspect the employee to be a steroid user as his mood flips quickly from over confident, to aggressive, to clingly and emotional.

I don't want to ruin him, but at the same time am highly suspicious of his behaviors.

Answer 1

They can't honor your request. If they don't test employees already, then it's discrimination to test him and only him.

It would be ridiculous to test (and expensive) to test an employee every time someone has a problem with staff.

If you don't like that employee, find another gym or avoid him. Being confident, emotional, or aggressive is not grounds for his dismissal or for you to lodge a complaint.

Find a new hobby.

Answer 2

If you write the corporation they will find a way to terminate the individual. No one will retain an employee that raises a customer concern even if the customer is wrong. A customer concern represents many customers to the corporation because most do not write in. So before you do any action consider this, Does his behavior effect the performance of his duties...or is it just a personality conflict. We must all work well together but we do not have to like one another.

Answer 3

Are you in the gym to work out or to report suspicious people who you suspect are on steroids. If you feel uncomfortable go some where else to work out.

Answer 4

Like maximum matters, it is way from undemanding. All pre-employment drug finding out is criminal. Random drug finding out of scholars in public faculties is criminal. Drug finding out for protection-tender positions is likewise criminal. meaning you are able to drug try a police officer, yet no longer the police document clerk. you are able to drug try truck drivers, heavy kit operators and authorities workers using authorities vehicles. you are able to't drug try the worker who isn't able to electrify public protection, like the CEO's secretary or my criminal assistant. This difficulty became examined in the U. S. preferrred courtroom case of Skinner vs. difficult artwork Assoc in 1989 and that is been the finest courtroom ruling on the issue. the substantial difficulty final is the definition of a "protection-tender position." ultimately, for workers, you are able to drug try everybody who has had an coincidence until eventually it obviously no longer the employees fault, like a rear-end collusion at a provide up gentle.

Answer 5

You run the risk of slander when you accuse someone of being a criminal and you can't prove it.

Try leaving the management a note describing the employees actions that disturb you. That is the truth, not slander, his actions disturb you. Don't accuse the employee of doing anything illegal.

If the management wants to keep your business, and I believe most businesses want to keep their doors open to customers, they will check into it.

Answer 6

I don't know if it's bad for you, but it's stupid if the employer singles this person out for a drug test based on the statements of a non-professional. You may have committed slander, but if this is in the US, the company may be sued for violating federal drug testing laws. Of course they could do a random drug test.......

Answer 7

Mind your own business. And it sounds like you DO want to ruin him.

Answer 8

I dont think it's bad of you at all. it is illegal to take steriods. you are helping the law enforcment people.

Good Job! Hope this helps! : )

Answer 9

I didn't realize it was any of your business what anyone else puts into their body voluntarily. Has he caused you harm? Next question please.